Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Across Canada

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic disparities in diabetes technology use have not been comprehensively explored across Canada. We describe SES disparities in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use among children in three Canadian provinces with differing public funding structures. Methods: We conducted a case–control study of children aged 1–18 years with type 1 diabetes using clinical data from three diabetes centers in Ontario, Alberta, and Québec. We measured SES using validated national neighborhood-level dimensions (residential instability, economic dependency [including employment], ethnocultural composition, and situational vulnerability [including education]). Cases were those with first-time CGM use in 2017–2022; controls were those without such use as of their last visit in that period. We examined the association between SES and CGM use using multilevel logistic regression with random effects for province, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, insulin pump use, and average hemoglobin A1c. Results: We identified 1770 children, 48.9% female, with median (interquartile range) age 11.8 (8.8–14.3) years and duration of diabetes 2.6 (0.7–5.9) years. Of the 1770 children, 1411 (79.7%) used CGM. We observed significant associations with CGM use for three of the four SES dimensions. Compared with the least deprived quintiles for economic dependency, those in the middle quintile had 17% higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.34) of using CGM. The most versus least diverse ethnocultural composition quintiles had 37% lower odds (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60, 0.67) of using CGM, and those in the most versus least deprived quintiles for situational vulnerability (including least well-educated) had 50% lower odds (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40, 0.62) of using CGM. Conclusions and Relevance: We found significant associations of employment status, ethnocultural diversity, and education with CGM use across Canada. Future work should promote equitable technology use among all groups.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1089/dtom.2025.0032
Primary Topic
Diabetes Management and Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Across Canada

Marc Dorais, Rayzel Shulman, Caroline Zuijdwijk, Danièle Pacaud et al.
1 links
Diabetes Technology and Obesity Medicine
Diabetes Management and Research
article

Disparities in Continuous Glucose Monitoring Use in Children with Type 1 Diabetes Across Canada

Marc Dorais, Rayzel Shulman, Caroline Zuijdwijk, Danièle Pacaud, Ellen B Goldbloom, Elham Rahme, Meranda Nakhla, Julia von Oettingen, Jennifer M. Ladd
article en

Abstract

Background: Socioeconomic status (SES) and ethnic disparities in diabetes technology use have not been comprehensively explored across Canada. We describe SES disparities in continuous glucose monitoring (CGM) use among children in three Canadian provinces with differing public funding structures. Methods: We conducted a case–control study of children aged 1–18 years with type 1 diabetes using clinical data from three diabetes centers in Ontario, Alberta, and Québec. We measured SES using validated national neighborhood-level dimensions (residential instability, economic dependency [including employment], ethnocultural composition, and situational vulnerability [including education]). Cases were those with first-time CGM use in 2017–2022; controls were those without such use as of their last visit in that period. We examined the association between SES and CGM use using multilevel logistic regression with random effects for province, adjusting for age, sex, diabetes duration, insulin pump use, and average hemoglobin A1c. Results: We identified 1770 children, 48.9% female, with median (interquartile range) age 11.8 (8.8–14.3) years and duration of diabetes 2.6 (0.7–5.9) years. Of the 1770 children, 1411 (79.7%) used CGM. We observed significant associations with CGM use for three of the four SES dimensions. Compared with the least deprived quintiles for economic dependency, those in the middle quintile had 17% higher odds (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.34) of using CGM. The most versus least diverse ethnocultural composition quintiles had 37% lower odds (aOR 0.63, 95% CI 0.60, 0.67) of using CGM, and those in the most versus least deprived quintiles for situational vulnerability (including least well-educated) had 50% lower odds (aOR 0.50, 95% CI 0.40, 0.62) of using CGM. Conclusions and Relevance: We found significant associations of employment status, ethnocultural diversity, and education with CGM use across Canada. Future work should promote equitable technology use among all groups.

Diabetes Technology and Obesity MedicineVol. 1(1)
Nationwide Children's Hospital (US), University of Ottawa (CA), University of Calgary (CA), Children's Hospital of Eastern Ontario (CA), Agricultural Research Institute of Ontario (CA), Hospital for Sick Children (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital (CA), SickKids Foundation (CA), Alberta Children's Hospital Research Institute, McGill University (CA)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Diabetes Management and Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.