Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connectivity in the brain

The networked architecture of the brain promotes synchrony among neuronal populations. These communication patterns can be mapped using functional imaging, yielding functional connectivity (FC) networks. While most studies use Pearson's correlations by default, numerous pairwise interaction statistics exist in the scientific literature. How does the organization of the FC matrix vary with the choice of pairwise statistic? Here we use a library of 239 pairwise statistics to benchmark canonical features of FC networks, including hub mapping, weight-distance trade-offs, structure-function coupling, correspondence with other neurophysiological networks, individual fingerprinting and brain-behavior prediction. We find substantial quantitative and qualitative variation across FC methods. Measures such as covariance, precision and distance display multiple desirable properties, including correspondence with structural connectivity and the capacity to differentiate individuals and predict individual differences in behavior. Our report highlights how FC mapping can be optimized by tailoring pairwise statistics to specific neurophysiological mechanisms and research questions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Methods
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s41592-025-02704-4
Citations
15
Primary Topic
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
21.47

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connectivity in the brain

Justine Y. Hansen, B.T. Thomas Yeo, Andrew Zalesky, Bratislav Mišić et al.
15 citations
Nature Methods
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
21.47
article

Benchmarking methods for mapping functional connectivity in the brain

Justine Y. Hansen, B.T. Thomas Yeo, Andrew Zalesky, Bratislav Mišić, Andrea I. Luppi, Ye Tian, Zhen-Qi Liu, Ben Fulcher
article en
15 citations

Abstract

The networked architecture of the brain promotes synchrony among neuronal populations. These communication patterns can be mapped using functional imaging, yielding functional connectivity (FC) networks. While most studies use Pearson's correlations by default, numerous pairwise interaction statistics exist in the scientific literature. How does the organization of the FC matrix vary with the choice of pairwise statistic? Here we use a library of 239 pairwise statistics to benchmark canonical features of FC networks, including hub mapping, weight-distance trade-offs, structure-function coupling, correspondence with other neurophysiological networks, individual fingerprinting and brain-behavior prediction. We find substantial quantitative and qualitative variation across FC methods. Measures such as covariance, precision and distance display multiple desirable properties, including correspondence with structural connectivity and the capacity to differentiate individuals and predict individual differences in behavior. Our report highlights how FC mapping can be optimized by tailoring pairwise statistics to specific neurophysiological mechanisms and research questions.

Nature MethodsVol. 22(7)
Montreal Neurological Institute and Hospital (CA), The University of Sydney (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), National University of Singapore (SG), Melbourne Health (AU), McGill University (CA)
Fondation Brain Canada, Canada Research Chairs, Temasek Foundation, National Institutes of Health, Canadian Institutes of Health Research, Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada, Medical Research Council, National Medical Research Council, Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Functional Brain Connectivity Studies
21.47
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.