Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology

Clinical decision-making in oncology is complex, requiring the integration of multimodal data and multidomain expertise. We developed and evaluated an autonomous clinical artificial intelligence (AI) agent leveraging GPT-4 with multimodal precision oncology tools to support personalized clinical decision-making. The system incorporates vision transformers for detecting microsatellite instability and KRAS and BRAF mutations from histopathology slides, MedSAM for radiological image segmentation and web-based search tools such as OncoKB, PubMed and Google. Evaluated on 20 realistic multimodal patient cases, the AI agent autonomously used appropriate tools with 87.5% accuracy, reached correct clinical conclusions in 91.0% of cases and accurately cited relevant oncology guidelines 75.5% of the time. Compared to GPT-4 alone, the integrated AI agent drastically improved decision-making accuracy from 30.3% to 87.2%. These findings demonstrate that integrating language models with precision oncology and search tools substantially enhances clinical accuracy, establishing a robust foundation for deploying AI-driven personalized oncology support systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Nature Cancer
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1038/s43018-025-00991-6
Citations
76
Primary Topic
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
103.37

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology

Marie-Elisabeth Leßmann, Daniel Truhn, Isabella C. Wiest, Maximilian Tschochohei et al.
76 citations
Nature Cancer
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
103.37
article

Development and validation of an autonomous artificial intelligence agent for clinical decision-making in oncology

Marie-Elisabeth Leßmann, Daniel Truhn, Isabella C. Wiest, Maximilian Tschochohei, Jacqueline Lammert, Nikolaus Schultz, Jan Clusmann, Manuel Salto‐Tellez, Dyke Ferber, Georg Wölflein, Sebastian Foersch, Jakob Nikolas Kather, Omar S. M. El Nahhas, Dirk Jaeger
article en
76 citations

Abstract

Clinical decision-making in oncology is complex, requiring the integration of multimodal data and multidomain expertise. We developed and evaluated an autonomous clinical artificial intelligence (AI) agent leveraging GPT-4 with multimodal precision oncology tools to support personalized clinical decision-making. The system incorporates vision transformers for detecting microsatellite instability and KRAS and BRAF mutations from histopathology slides, MedSAM for radiological image segmentation and web-based search tools such as OncoKB, PubMed and Google. Evaluated on 20 realistic multimodal patient cases, the AI agent autonomously used appropriate tools with 87.5% accuracy, reached correct clinical conclusions in 91.0% of cases and accurately cited relevant oncology guidelines 75.5% of the time. Compared to GPT-4 alone, the integrated AI agent drastically improved decision-making accuracy from 30.3% to 87.2%. These findings demonstrate that integrating language models with precision oncology and search tools substantially enhances clinical accuracy, establishing a robust foundation for deploying AI-driven personalized oncology support systems.

Nature CancerVol. 6(8)
European Organisation for Rare Diseases (FR), Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (US), University of St Andrews (GB), Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Heidelberg University (DE), University Hospital Heidelberg (DE), TUM Klinikum (DE), University Medical Center of the Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz (DE), Fresenius (Germany) (DE), National Center for Tumor Diseases (DE), Universitätsklinikum Aachen (DE), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), University Medical Centre Mannheim (DE), Deutsches Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung (DE), Technical University of Munich (DE), Technische Universität Dresden (DE), RWTH Aachen University (DE)
National Institute for Health and Care Research, Department of Health and Social Care, European Commission, Deutscher Akademischer Austauschdienst, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung, Bundesministerium für Gesundheit, Deutsche Krebshilfe, Deutschen Konsortium für Translationale Krebsforschung, Gemeinsame Bundesausschuss, HORIZON EUROPE Framework Programme
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Radiomics and Machine Learning in Medical Imaging
103.37
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.