Enhancing decision support in crop production: Analyzing conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification

Assessing the confidence of machine learning models is increasingly important for enhancing decision support in digital agriculture. Addressing this challenge involves identifying and classifying sources of uncertainty and applying a suitable quantification method. To fully realize the potential of uncertainty quantification in digital agriculture, it is necessary to explore and evaluate different techniques, demonstrating their effectiveness in diverse scenarios. In this paper, we focus on the conformal prediction (CP) framework, specifically inductive conformal prediction (ICP), as a non-parametric tool for uncertainty quantification. Conformal prediction has gained a foothold for its multiple advantages, including being model-agnostic – requiring no retraining or changes to model architecture – and computationally efficient. Moreover, CP operates under a distribution-free framework, making no assumptions about the data, and provides calibrated uncertainty estimates where empirical errors match pre-defined theoretical levels. These properties make it particularly well-suited for agricultural tasks, where datasets often exhibit variability across regions and lack reliable ground truth labels. Through ablation studies, we comprehensively analyze ICP’s performance as a post-hoc approach for ResNet-18 and ViT-B/16, demonstrating that both achieve the required pre-defined error levels. We compare ICP performance against other methods in diverse agricultural tasks, including out-of-distribution detection and covariate shift. Our experiments highlight CP’s unique benefits, such as validity, efficiency, and low computational overhead, making it a promising approach for developing more reliable agricultural machine learning systems. • Macro and Micro Analysis: Ablation study reveals CP’s strengths in diverse agricultural tasks. • Diagnostic Tool: CP offers calibrated uncertainty and insights into data and model quality. • Comparative Study: CP has acceptable performance in distributional shifts but faces challenges in OoD detection. • Future Research Directions: Proposes ways to enhance CP’s utility for broader agricultural scenarios. • Empowering Agriculture: CP delivers interpretable, efficient models for informed farming decisions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.compag.2025.110559
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
7.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Enhancing decision support in crop production: Analyzing conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification

Ahmed Emam, Ribana Roscher, Johannes Leonhardt, Mohamed Farag
4 citations
Computers and Electronics in Agriculture
Smart Agriculture and AI
7.00
article

Enhancing decision support in crop production: Analyzing conformal prediction for uncertainty quantification

Ahmed Emam, Ribana Roscher, Johannes Leonhardt, Mohamed Farag
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Assessing the confidence of machine learning models is increasingly important for enhancing decision support in digital agriculture. Addressing this challenge involves identifying and classifying sources of uncertainty and applying a suitable quantification method. To fully realize the potential of uncertainty quantification in digital agriculture, it is necessary to explore and evaluate different techniques, demonstrating their effectiveness in diverse scenarios. In this paper, we focus on the conformal prediction (CP) framework, specifically inductive conformal prediction (ICP), as a non-parametric tool for uncertainty quantification. Conformal prediction has gained a foothold for its multiple advantages, including being model-agnostic – requiring no retraining or changes to model architecture – and computationally efficient. Moreover, CP operates under a distribution-free framework, making no assumptions about the data, and provides calibrated uncertainty estimates where empirical errors match pre-defined theoretical levels. These properties make it particularly well-suited for agricultural tasks, where datasets often exhibit variability across regions and lack reliable ground truth labels. Through ablation studies, we comprehensively analyze ICP’s performance as a post-hoc approach for ResNet-18 and ViT-B/16, demonstrating that both achieve the required pre-defined error levels. We compare ICP performance against other methods in diverse agricultural tasks, including out-of-distribution detection and covariate shift. Our experiments highlight CP’s unique benefits, such as validity, efficiency, and low computational overhead, making it a promising approach for developing more reliable agricultural machine learning systems. • Macro and Micro Analysis: Ablation study reveals CP’s strengths in diverse agricultural tasks. • Diagnostic Tool: CP offers calibrated uncertainty and insights into data and model quality. • Comparative Study: CP has acceptable performance in distributional shifts but faces challenges in OoD detection. • Future Research Directions: Proposes ways to enhance CP’s utility for broader agricultural scenarios. • Empowering Agriculture: CP delivers interpretable, efficient models for informed farming decisions.

Computers and Electronics in AgricultureVol. 237
University of Bonn (DE), Forschungszentrum Jülich (DE)
Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Smart Agriculture and AI
7.00
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.