Participatory Practice in Pursuit of Social Justice

The idea that people should have a voice in decisions that affect them is now widely accepted in the US health sector. Practices such as patient and family advisory boards, community-based participatory research, patient-centered research, and public deliberation are becoming commonplace. The appeal of public participation turns on a number of purported benefits, including the potential for more inclusive and transparent decision-making, equitable interventions and outcomes, and public trust in institutions. Considerable conceptual work has refined definitions and frameworks of participatory processes, and ample experimentation is underway. Yet participation remains an ambiguous concept and highly variable in practice. Drawing on the authors' collective experiences in life and work, this article clarifies what participatory processes are, describes how they might support varied goals of justice, and identifies opportunities and considerations for their use in health-care organizations. Although participatory processes alone cannot solve the erosion of trust in American health care or remedy marked US health inequities, they can be an important tool for health-care leaders who wish to work toward building fairer health systems, services, and outcomes.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in biology and medicine
Published
2025-03-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1353/pbm.2025.a962017
Primary Topic
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Participatory Practice in Pursuit of Social Justice

Jonathan M. Marron, Erika Blacksher, Julius Yang, Basel Tarab
Perspectives in biology and medicine
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
article

Participatory Practice in Pursuit of Social Justice

Jonathan M. Marron, Erika Blacksher, Julius Yang, Basel Tarab
article en

Abstract

The idea that people should have a voice in decisions that affect them is now widely accepted in the US health sector. Practices such as patient and family advisory boards, community-based participatory research, patient-centered research, and public deliberation are becoming commonplace. The appeal of public participation turns on a number of purported benefits, including the potential for more inclusive and transparent decision-making, equitable interventions and outcomes, and public trust in institutions. Considerable conceptual work has refined definitions and frameworks of participatory processes, and ample experimentation is underway. Yet participation remains an ambiguous concept and highly variable in practice. Drawing on the authors' collective experiences in life and work, this article clarifies what participatory processes are, describes how they might support varied goals of justice, and identifies opportunities and considerations for their use in health-care organizations. Although participatory processes alone cannot solve the erosion of trust in American health care or remedy marked US health inequities, they can be an important tool for health-care leaders who wish to work toward building fairer health systems, services, and outcomes.

Perspectives in biology and medicineVol. 68(2)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Mental Health and Patient Involvement
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.