Sugarcane Leaf Disease Detection: A Comparative Analysis Using Deep Learning

In this paper, sugarcane leaf diseases were detected through image analysis.This research investigated the effectiveness of four deep learning models, ResNet101, DenseNet161, MobileNetV2, and AlexNet, for sugarcane leaf disease detection.A dataset of sugarcane leaf images was categorized into healthy and various disease classes, and those models were trained and validated on that dataset.The result demonstrated a superior performance which achieved a validation accuracy of 97.41% and a validation loss of 0.0902 by DenseNet161, whereas ResNet101 attained a slightly lower outcome with a validation accuracy of 97.21% and a validation loss of 0.0971.A validation accuracy of 95.82% and a validation loss of 0.1541 were obtained using MobileNetV2.AlexNet obtained the lowest performance with a validation accuracy of 91.43%, and a validation loss of 0.2505, and its performance evaluation was the lowest compared to other models.DenseNet161 and ResNet101 showed high accuracy and low loss for sugarcane leaf disease detection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-10-17
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3723178.3723197
Primary Topic
Smart Agriculture and AI
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sugarcane Leaf Disease Detection: A Comparative Analysis Using Deep Learning

Afsana Nadia, Mohammad Nuruzzaman, Md Mashum Billal, Khan Md Shibli Nomani
Smart Agriculture and AI
article

Sugarcane Leaf Disease Detection: A Comparative Analysis Using Deep Learning

Afsana Nadia, Mohammad Nuruzzaman, Md Mashum Billal, Khan Md Shibli Nomani
article en

Abstract

In this paper, sugarcane leaf diseases were detected through image analysis.This research investigated the effectiveness of four deep learning models, ResNet101, DenseNet161, MobileNetV2, and AlexNet, for sugarcane leaf disease detection.A dataset of sugarcane leaf images was categorized into healthy and various disease classes, and those models were trained and validated on that dataset.The result demonstrated a superior performance which achieved a validation accuracy of 97.41% and a validation loss of 0.0902 by DenseNet161, whereas ResNet101 attained a slightly lower outcome with a validation accuracy of 97.21% and a validation loss of 0.0971.A validation accuracy of 95.82% and a validation loss of 0.1541 were obtained using MobileNetV2.AlexNet obtained the lowest performance with a validation accuracy of 91.43%, and a validation loss of 0.2505, and its performance evaluation was the lowest compared to other models.DenseNet161 and ResNet101 showed high accuracy and low loss for sugarcane leaf disease detection.

American International University-Bangladesh (BD), University of Science and Technology of China (CN), Hajee Mohammad Danesh Science and Technology University (BD), East West University (BD)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Smart Agriculture and AI
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.