Satellite Image Price Prediction Based on Machine Learning

This study develops a comprehensive, data-driven framework for predicting satellite imagery prices using four state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Two distinct datasets—optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery—were assembled, each characterized by nine technical and economic features (e.g., imaging mode, spatial resolution, satellite manufacturing cost, and acquisition timeliness). Bayesian optimization is employed to systematically tune hyperparameters, thereby minimizing overfitting and maximizing generalization. Models are evaluated on held-out test sets (20% of data) using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R), mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE). For optical imagery, the Bayesian-optimized XGBoost model achieves the best performance (R=0.9870, RMSE=$3.44/km2, NSE=0.9651, KGE=0.8950), followed closely by CatBoost (R=0.9826, RMSE=$3.83/km2). For SAR imagery, CatBoost outperforms all others after optimization (R=0.9278, RMSE=$9.94/km2, NSE=0.8575, KGE=0.8443), reflecting its robustness to heavy-tailed price distributions. AdaBoost also demonstrates competitive accuracy, while LightGBM and XGBoost exhibit larger errors in high-value regimes. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis reveals that imaging mode and spatial resolution are the primary drivers of price variance across both domains, followed by satellite manufacturing cost and acquisition recency. These insights demonstrate how ensemble models capture nonlinear, high-dimensional interactions that traditional rule-based pricing schemes overlook. Compared to static, experience-driven price brackets, our machine learning approach provides a scalable, transparent, and economically rational pricing engine—adaptable to rapidly changing market conditions and capable of supporting fine-grained, application-specific pricing strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Remote Sensing
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/rs17121960
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
3.13

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Satellite Image Price Prediction Based on Machine Learning

Zugang Chen, Guoqing Li, Linhan Yang
1 citations
Remote Sensing
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
article

Satellite Image Price Prediction Based on Machine Learning

Zugang Chen, Guoqing Li, Linhan Yang
article en
1 citations

Abstract

This study develops a comprehensive, data-driven framework for predicting satellite imagery prices using four state-of-the-art ensemble learning algorithms: XGBoost, LightGBM, AdaBoost, and CatBoost. Two distinct datasets—optical and Synthetic Aperture Radar (SAR) imagery—were assembled, each characterized by nine technical and economic features (e.g., imaging mode, spatial resolution, satellite manufacturing cost, and acquisition timeliness). Bayesian optimization is employed to systematically tune hyperparameters, thereby minimizing overfitting and maximizing generalization. Models are evaluated on held-out test sets (20% of data) using Pearson’s correlation coefficient (R), mean bias error (MBE), root mean square error (RMSE), unbiased RMSE (ubRMSE), Nash–Sutcliffe Efficiency (NSE), and Kling–Gupta Efficiency (KGE). For optical imagery, the Bayesian-optimized XGBoost model achieves the best performance (R=0.9870, RMSE=$3.44/km2, NSE=0.9651, KGE=0.8950), followed closely by CatBoost (R=0.9826, RMSE=$3.83/km2). For SAR imagery, CatBoost outperforms all others after optimization (R=0.9278, RMSE=$9.94/km2, NSE=0.8575, KGE=0.8443), reflecting its robustness to heavy-tailed price distributions. AdaBoost also demonstrates competitive accuracy, while LightGBM and XGBoost exhibit larger errors in high-value regimes. SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) analysis reveals that imaging mode and spatial resolution are the primary drivers of price variance across both domains, followed by satellite manufacturing cost and acquisition recency. These insights demonstrate how ensemble models capture nonlinear, high-dimensional interactions that traditional rule-based pricing schemes overlook. Compared to static, experience-driven price brackets, our machine learning approach provides a scalable, transparent, and economically rational pricing engine—adaptable to rapidly changing market conditions and capable of supporting fine-grained, application-specific pricing strategies.

Remote SensingVol. 17(12)
Chinese Academy of Sciences (CN), Zhengzhou University (CN), Aerospace Information Research Institute (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hainan Province
Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Energy, Environment, Economic Growth
3.13
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.