Evaluating the Power System Operational Flexibility with Explicit Quantitive Metrics

With carbon neutrality as a target and the increased penetration of renewable energy, the operational flexibility of power systems has begun to face challenges. In order to explicitly represent the operational flexibility of power systems, two types of flexibility indexes and corresponding models for their evaluation are established in this paper. One of the indexes is the supply–demand balance, which evaluates the adequacy of operational flexibility at the system level. The other is the availability of flexible resources, which comprehensively quantifies the flexibility of the power system from the perspectives of power generation, load, and energy storage. In the case study presented here, the proposed evaluation method is illustrated and validated based on a provincial power system in China. Next, the role of energy storage in enhancing flexibility is quantitatively analyzed using the proposed indexes. Then, the economic model reveals the nonlinear decline in the marginal benefit of investment in energy storage. Energy storage alone cannot fully meet the requirements for supply–demand balance in the power system, necessitating a comprehensive consideration of the available capacity for flexibility from the perspectives of generation, load, and energy storage. Analysis of a typical scenario shows that the provincial power system has 5000 MW of upward and downward flexibility in capacity. The numerical results highlight the critical importance of integrating flexibility across all components.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123013
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.73
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Evaluating the Power System Operational Flexibility with Explicit Quantitive Metrics

Fangzhao Deng, Hujun Li, Fei Guo
1 citations
Energies
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
0.73
article

Evaluating the Power System Operational Flexibility with Explicit Quantitive Metrics

Fangzhao Deng, Hujun Li, Fei Guo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

With carbon neutrality as a target and the increased penetration of renewable energy, the operational flexibility of power systems has begun to face challenges. In order to explicitly represent the operational flexibility of power systems, two types of flexibility indexes and corresponding models for their evaluation are established in this paper. One of the indexes is the supply–demand balance, which evaluates the adequacy of operational flexibility at the system level. The other is the availability of flexible resources, which comprehensively quantifies the flexibility of the power system from the perspectives of power generation, load, and energy storage. In the case study presented here, the proposed evaluation method is illustrated and validated based on a provincial power system in China. Next, the role of energy storage in enhancing flexibility is quantitatively analyzed using the proposed indexes. Then, the economic model reveals the nonlinear decline in the marginal benefit of investment in energy storage. Energy storage alone cannot fully meet the requirements for supply–demand balance in the power system, necessitating a comprehensive consideration of the available capacity for flexibility from the perspectives of generation, load, and energy storage. Analysis of a typical scenario shows that the provincial power system has 5000 MW of upward and downward flexibility in capacity. The numerical results highlight the critical importance of integrating flexibility across all components.

EnergiesVol. 18(12)
Chongqing University (CN), State Grid Corporation of China (China) (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 27%
Optimal Power Flow Distribution
0.73
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.