Implementation of the Stages of Election Nomination in Indonesia after the Abolition of the Presidental Threshold in Law Number 7 of 2017

Indonesia has had a presidential threshold system since the 2004 general election. The presidential threshold aims to strengthen the presidential system and reduce the existence of multiparties. In practice, the application of the presidential threshold raises pros and cons where on the one hand it is intended to find competent candidates on the other hand it can hamper the rights of the community and the rights of candidates so that it is not in accordance with the principles of Indonesian democracy. Since the Constitutional Court issued Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024, the presidential nomination threshold has been considered unconstitutional and legally invalid. The abolition of the presidential threshold makes the absence of vote and seat limits so that this can have an impact on the nomination process of presidential and vice-presidential candidates so that in this case certain arrangements and limits are needed in order to maintain conducive elections in Indonesia.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.47191/ijsshr/v8-i6-12
Primary Topic
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Implementation of the Stages of Election Nomination in Indonesia after the Abolition of the Presidental Threshold in Law Number 7 of 2017

Nur Fitri Anzani, SH. Prof. Azis Budianto
International Journal of Social Science and Human Research
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
article

Implementation of the Stages of Election Nomination in Indonesia after the Abolition of the Presidental Threshold in Law Number 7 of 2017

Nur Fitri Anzani, SH. Prof. Azis Budianto
article en

Abstract

Indonesia has had a presidential threshold system since the 2004 general election. The presidential threshold aims to strengthen the presidential system and reduce the existence of multiparties. In practice, the application of the presidential threshold raises pros and cons where on the one hand it is intended to find competent candidates on the other hand it can hamper the rights of the community and the rights of candidates so that it is not in accordance with the principles of Indonesian democracy. Since the Constitutional Court issued Decision Number 62/PUU-XXII/2024, the presidential nomination threshold has been considered unconstitutional and legally invalid. The abolition of the presidential threshold makes the absence of vote and seat limits so that this can have an impact on the nomination process of presidential and vice-presidential candidates so that in this case certain arrangements and limits are needed in order to maintain conducive elections in Indonesia.

International Journal of Social Science and Human ResearchVol. 08(06)
Openalex Percentile: Top 85%
Indonesian Election Politics and Participation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.