The relationship between Participatory Budgeting and territorial justice: a theoretical and practical contribution

Abstract Participatory budgeting (PB) is considered one of the main democratic innovations in urban management developed in the last decades. Today, most experiences lack the core values that guided the creation of PB in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil): inversion of priorities and social justice. Based on the assumption that PB is an institutional and political object of dispute for power within a territory, it is argued that it must be studied under the lens of territorial justice. A qualitative study was conducted (document analysis, fieldwork, and interviews) in two mid-sized cities with deliberative PBs, Araraquara (São Paulo, Brazil) and Vallejo (California, USA). The results point out a significant difference between the case studies, but also to PB’s relevant potential as a tool for territorial justice, demanding a context of massive institutional and political support.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cadernos Metrópole
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1590/2236-9996.2025-6368227-en
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Urban Planning and Governance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.18

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The relationship between Participatory Budgeting and territorial justice: a theoretical and practical contribution

Rodrigo Sartori Bogo
1 citations
Cadernos Metrópole
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
article

The relationship between Participatory Budgeting and territorial justice: a theoretical and practical contribution

Rodrigo Sartori Bogo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Abstract Participatory budgeting (PB) is considered one of the main democratic innovations in urban management developed in the last decades. Today, most experiences lack the core values that guided the creation of PB in the city of Porto Alegre (Brazil): inversion of priorities and social justice. Based on the assumption that PB is an institutional and political object of dispute for power within a territory, it is argued that it must be studied under the lens of territorial justice. A qualitative study was conducted (document analysis, fieldwork, and interviews) in two mid-sized cities with deliberative PBs, Araraquara (São Paulo, Brazil) and Vallejo (California, USA). The results point out a significant difference between the case studies, but also to PB’s relevant potential as a tool for territorial justice, demanding a context of massive institutional and political support.

Cadernos MetrópoleVol. 27(63)
Universidade Estadual Paulista (Unesp) (BR)
Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo
Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Urban Planning and Governance
6.18
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.