Seasonal Changes in Fish <scp>eDNA</scp> Signal Vary Between Contrasting River Types

ABSTRACT Due to the societal reliance on goods and services provided by river systems and their close proximity to settlements, few modern‐day rivers are without significant anthropogenic modifications. The natural river hydrology is often altered as a consequence of pumping water for flood alleviation, retaining water for irrigation, and modifying channels for navigation. In recent years, water pumping stations have been found to have several adverse impacts, including fish mortality (direct and indirect) and habitat fragmentation. More broadly, modern‐day river systems face a myriad of anthropogenic flow and channel modifications, with varying impacts on different fish life stages. To manage such risks in line with policy, knowledge of the overall fish community and priority species present is required. It is therefore important to understand the robustness of developing survey strategies across differently managed river systems. This study investigates the seasonal patterns of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding fish detections from water samples taken across three differently managed river types over a one‐year period. We observed some significant seasonal variation in detection rates and fish communities; however, this variation was not consistent among river types. Despite this, we found comparatively poor fish communities upstream of pumping stations all year round, with pumped catchments containing significantly fewer species than the adjacent main river channel and our regional control site. Finally, we highlight that seasonal variation in detectability for the overall fish community may not always reflect that of priority species. In our case, we found favorable European eel ( Anguilla anguilla ) detection in the summer months across all river types. It is therefore recommended that rather than focusing on overall detectability, policy‐driven targeted surveys should be designed with priority species ecology in mind.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental DNA
Published
2025-05-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/edn3.70060
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.30

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Seasonal Changes in Fish eDNA Signal Vary Between Contrasting River Types

Nathan P. Griffiths, Graham S. Sellers, Petr Blabolil, Jonathan David Bolland et al.
6 citations
Environmental DNA
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
10.30
article

Seasonal Changes in Fish eDNA Signal Vary Between Contrasting River Types

Nathan P. Griffiths, Graham S. Sellers, Petr Blabolil, Jonathan David Bolland, Rosalind M. Wright, Bernd Hänfling, James A. Macarthur
article en
6 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT Due to the societal reliance on goods and services provided by river systems and their close proximity to settlements, few modern‐day rivers are without significant anthropogenic modifications. The natural river hydrology is often altered as a consequence of pumping water for flood alleviation, retaining water for irrigation, and modifying channels for navigation. In recent years, water pumping stations have been found to have several adverse impacts, including fish mortality (direct and indirect) and habitat fragmentation. More broadly, modern‐day river systems face a myriad of anthropogenic flow and channel modifications, with varying impacts on different fish life stages. To manage such risks in line with policy, knowledge of the overall fish community and priority species present is required. It is therefore important to understand the robustness of developing survey strategies across differently managed river systems. This study investigates the seasonal patterns of environmental DNA (eDNA) metabarcoding fish detections from water samples taken across three differently managed river types over a one‐year period. We observed some significant seasonal variation in detection rates and fish communities; however, this variation was not consistent among river types. Despite this, we found comparatively poor fish communities upstream of pumping stations all year round, with pumped catchments containing significantly fewer species than the adjacent main river channel and our regional control site. Finally, we highlight that seasonal variation in detectability for the overall fish community may not always reflect that of priority species. In our case, we found favorable European eel ( Anguilla anguilla ) detection in the summer months across all river types. It is therefore recommended that rather than focusing on overall detectability, policy‐driven targeted surveys should be designed with priority species ecology in mind.

Environmental DNAVol. 7(3)
Environment Agency (GB), University of Hull (GB), University of South Bohemia in České Budějovice (CZ), Institute of Hydrobiology, Biology Centre, Academy of Sciences of the Czech Republic (CZ), Czech Academy of Sciences, Biology Centre (CZ), University of the Highlands and Islands (GB)
Environment Agency
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Environmental DNA in Biodiversity Studies
10.30
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.