How do IT misalignments and IT ambidexterity imbalances lead to organizational agility? Substitution, complementarity, and contingency interdependencies with a configurational approach

• Configurational study of IT ambidexterity and IT alignment components for agility. • Unveils interdependencies between exploitation/exploration in IT/business domains. • Complementarity between IT and business explorative capabilities for high agility. • Substitution between IT and business exploitative capabilities for high agility. • Contingent (positive/negative) effects of IT exploitation upon other capabilities. • Four propositions for future research capture the three types of interdependencies. • Explains why certain IT misaligned and non-ambidextrous firms achieve agility. • Reconciles past inconsistent findings. • Demonstrates more pathways to agility than current literature. • Prevents theoretical overdetermination. • Provides insights beyond current research on IT ambidexterity and IT alignment. Two main and separate Information Systems (IS) research streams have investigated the link between information technology (IT) and organizational agility via the concepts of IT ambidexterity and IT alignment. This study examines IT ambidexterity and IT alignment for agility by breaking down each concept and investigating questions regarding the balance between exploitation and exploration alongside those of fit between the IT and business domains. To do so, we apply configurational theory inductively to empirically identify and theorize how interdependencies between capability types (i.e., exploitation and exploration) and domains (i.e., IT and business) lead to agility. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of data gathered through a survey of manufacturing SMEs unveils three specific forms of interdependencies: (1) complementarity of exploration between the IT and business domains; (2) substitution of exploitation between the two domains; and (3) contingent effects (positive vs. negative) of each, IT exploitation and IT exploration, depending upon the intensity of the remaining elements. These interdependencies enable the derivation of four theoretically meaningful propositions for future research that reconcile inconsistent findings in both research streams. Overall, this study contributes beyond past research focused on either IT ambidexterity or IT alignment by providing a compelling parsimonious theoretical explanation of how – and which – IT misalignments and imbalances between exploitation and exploration lead to high agility and which do not. These insights are also of high practical value, as they provide manufacturing SMEs with more options to reach agility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jsis.2025.101907
Primary Topic
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How do IT misalignments and IT ambidexterity imbalances lead to organizational agility? Substitution, complementarity, and contingency interdependencies with a configurational approach

Louis Raymond, Ana Ortíz de Guinea
The Journal of Strategic Information Systems
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
article

How do IT misalignments and IT ambidexterity imbalances lead to organizational agility? Substitution, complementarity, and contingency interdependencies with a configurational approach

Louis Raymond, Ana Ortíz de Guinea
article en

Abstract

• Configurational study of IT ambidexterity and IT alignment components for agility. • Unveils interdependencies between exploitation/exploration in IT/business domains. • Complementarity between IT and business explorative capabilities for high agility. • Substitution between IT and business exploitative capabilities for high agility. • Contingent (positive/negative) effects of IT exploitation upon other capabilities. • Four propositions for future research capture the three types of interdependencies. • Explains why certain IT misaligned and non-ambidextrous firms achieve agility. • Reconciles past inconsistent findings. • Demonstrates more pathways to agility than current literature. • Prevents theoretical overdetermination. • Provides insights beyond current research on IT ambidexterity and IT alignment. Two main and separate Information Systems (IS) research streams have investigated the link between information technology (IT) and organizational agility via the concepts of IT ambidexterity and IT alignment. This study examines IT ambidexterity and IT alignment for agility by breaking down each concept and investigating questions regarding the balance between exploitation and exploration alongside those of fit between the IT and business domains. To do so, we apply configurational theory inductively to empirically identify and theorize how interdependencies between capability types (i.e., exploitation and exploration) and domains (i.e., IT and business) lead to agility. A fuzzy set qualitative comparative analysis (fsQCA) of data gathered through a survey of manufacturing SMEs unveils three specific forms of interdependencies: (1) complementarity of exploration between the IT and business domains; (2) substitution of exploitation between the two domains; and (3) contingent effects (positive vs. negative) of each, IT exploitation and IT exploration, depending upon the intensity of the remaining elements. These interdependencies enable the derivation of four theoretically meaningful propositions for future research that reconcile inconsistent findings in both research streams. Overall, this study contributes beyond past research focused on either IT ambidexterity or IT alignment by providing a compelling parsimonious theoretical explanation of how – and which – IT misalignments and imbalances between exploitation and exploration lead to high agility and which do not. These insights are also of high practical value, as they provide manufacturing SMEs with more options to reach agility.

The Journal of Strategic Information SystemsVol. 34(3)
HEC Montréal (CA), Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Information Technology Governance and Strategy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.