What’s so Wrong with Personification? Toward a Theory of Personhood in Science Education

Abstract In this article, we revisit the contentious history of personification to explore its potential for shifting the aesthetics of science education. We argue that personification can act as a boundary object to open up new aesthetic possibilities for science and education, toward an aesthetics of personhood. Drawing on philosophy, Indigenous knowledge systems, feminist science studies, and emerging scientific fields, we propose a relational notion of personhood for science education that is inclusive of human and more-than-human beings. We position relational personhood in science education as an aesthetic shift that can reconfigure what is possible, visible, and say-able in science education, ultimately contributing to a science education that is ‘fit for the future’ and respons-able to the challenges of the Anthropocene.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Research in Science Education
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s11165-025-10268-8
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.89

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

What’s so Wrong with Personification? Toward a Theory of Personhood in Science Education

Bronwen Cowie, Sara Tolbert, Pauline Waiti, Rose Hipkins
2 citations
Research in Science Education
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
article

What’s so Wrong with Personification? Toward a Theory of Personhood in Science Education

Bronwen Cowie, Sara Tolbert, Pauline Waiti, Rose Hipkins
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract In this article, we revisit the contentious history of personification to explore its potential for shifting the aesthetics of science education. We argue that personification can act as a boundary object to open up new aesthetic possibilities for science and education, toward an aesthetics of personhood. Drawing on philosophy, Indigenous knowledge systems, feminist science studies, and emerging scientific fields, we propose a relational notion of personhood for science education that is inclusive of human and more-than-human beings. We position relational personhood in science education as an aesthetic shift that can reconfigure what is possible, visible, and say-able in science education, ultimately contributing to a science education that is ‘fit for the future’ and respons-able to the challenges of the Anthropocene.

Research in Science EducationVol. 55(4)
University of Canterbury (NZ), New Zealand Council for Educational Research (NZ), New Zealand Association of Counsellors (NZ), University of Waikato (NZ), Monash University (AU)
Monash University
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Educational Strategies and Epistemologies
6.89
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

What’s so Wrong with Personification? Toward a Theory of Personhood in Science Education — Bronwen Cowie, Sara Tolbert, et al. · Research in Science Education (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS