From bench to bucks: measuring the medical technology transfer

Research innovation and technology transfer in the biomedical field are essential for advancing healthcare and socio-economic development. Despite significant government funding, the efficiency of transforming scientific discoveries into practical applications remains a challenge due to the industry’s complexity, financial demands, and long development cycles. This study utilizes Feasible Generalized Least Squares regression on the Association of University Technology Managers data from 1999 to 2023 to analyze the efficiency of technology transfer across different types of research institutions, including universities, hospitals, and universities with or without medical schools, from an overall perspective. The findings reveal a consistent positive correlation between research expenditures and received benefits, with an overall Return on Investment (ROI) of approximately 1.8% for technology transfer. Notably, hospitals exhibit a higher ROI compared to universities, with universities having medical schools showing a slightly higher rate than those without. Additionally, top universities without medical schools show significant performance disparities due to differences in their disciplinary structures, while those with medical schools tend to exhibit relatively smaller performance gaps, indicating benefits from disciplinary comprehensiveness. The study also identifies a time-lag effect in universities’ (especially with medical schools) technology transfer and greater stability in ROIs over time. These insights underscore the influence of institutional type, disciplinary structure, and time factor on technology transfer efficiency, and they also provide actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to optimize resource allocation, enhance institutional strategies, and foster innovation in the biomedical sectors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10961-025-10211-z
Primary Topic
Innovation Policy and R&D
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

From bench to bucks: measuring the medical technology transfer

Peixin He, Yang Y. Xu, Xue Jiang, Ying Zhang et al.
The Journal of Technology Transfer
Innovation Policy and R&D
article

From bench to bucks: measuring the medical technology transfer

Peixin He, Yang Y. Xu, Xue Jiang, Ying Zhang, Xinglong Tang
article en

Abstract

Research innovation and technology transfer in the biomedical field are essential for advancing healthcare and socio-economic development. Despite significant government funding, the efficiency of transforming scientific discoveries into practical applications remains a challenge due to the industry’s complexity, financial demands, and long development cycles. This study utilizes Feasible Generalized Least Squares regression on the Association of University Technology Managers data from 1999 to 2023 to analyze the efficiency of technology transfer across different types of research institutions, including universities, hospitals, and universities with or without medical schools, from an overall perspective. The findings reveal a consistent positive correlation between research expenditures and received benefits, with an overall Return on Investment (ROI) of approximately 1.8% for technology transfer. Notably, hospitals exhibit a higher ROI compared to universities, with universities having medical schools showing a slightly higher rate than those without. Additionally, top universities without medical schools show significant performance disparities due to differences in their disciplinary structures, while those with medical schools tend to exhibit relatively smaller performance gaps, indicating benefits from disciplinary comprehensiveness. The study also identifies a time-lag effect in universities’ (especially with medical schools) technology transfer and greater stability in ROIs over time. These insights underscore the influence of institutional type, disciplinary structure, and time factor on technology transfer efficiency, and they also provide actionable recommendations for policymakers and stakeholders to optimize resource allocation, enhance institutional strategies, and foster innovation in the biomedical sectors.

The Journal of Technology Transfer
Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (CN), Peking University (CN), Peking University Third Hospital (CN)
Massachusetts General Hospital, Yale University, Brown University, Vanderbilt University, Princeton University, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, University of Pennsylvania, Emory University, California Institute of Technology, Mayo Foundation for Medical Education and Research, Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center, Northwestern University, Harvard University, Cleveland Clinic, Rice University, Johns Hopkins University, Carnegie Mellon University, Georgetown University, University of Notre Dame, Moffitt Cancer Center, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, City of Hope, National Natural Science Foundation of China
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Innovation Policy and R&D
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.