Differential Seismic Phase Detection Probability as a Potential Discriminant of Explosions and Earthquakes

Abstract Deep learning models trained to estimate the probability of seismic P and S phases are rapidly expanding the scale of local event detections. Here, we evaluate the potential for deep learning model output phase detection probabilities to contribute to event-type classification, particularly discrimination of single-fired borehole explosions and earthquakes at local distances (<300 km). Motivated by the empirical success of P/S amplitude ratios, we consider the difference between P and S pick probability output from previously developed phase detection models, Pprob−Sprob, as a discriminant. Test data include ML∼1–4 earthquakes and explosions observed by common seismographs in ten geologically diverse localities. Depending on the picking model and training data, binary classification using Pprob−Sprob with at least three stations can achieve approximately equivalent classification accuracy as P/S amplitude ratios without requiring any customization. Joint classification with P/S and Pprob−Sprob improves accuracy for most quality control scenarios. Pick probabilities are an efficient attribute to consider in explosion discrimination because they can be automated byproducts of event detection. They avoid the binary choice of picking or not picking weakly visible S waves common to explosions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Seismic Record
Published
2025-04-01
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0320250015
Citations
4
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
9.92

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Differential Seismic Phase Detection Probability as a Potential Discriminant of Explosions and Earthquakes

Qingkai Kong, Chenglong Duan, Ruijia Wang, Brandon Schmandt et al.
4 citations
The Seismic Record
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
9.92
article

Differential Seismic Phase Detection Probability as a Potential Discriminant of Explosions and Earthquakes

Qingkai Kong, Chenglong Duan, Ruijia Wang, Brandon Schmandt, Ross Maguire
article en
4 citations

Abstract

Abstract Deep learning models trained to estimate the probability of seismic P and S phases are rapidly expanding the scale of local event detections. Here, we evaluate the potential for deep learning model output phase detection probabilities to contribute to event-type classification, particularly discrimination of single-fired borehole explosions and earthquakes at local distances (<300 km). Motivated by the empirical success of P/S amplitude ratios, we consider the difference between P and S pick probability output from previously developed phase detection models, Pprob−Sprob, as a discriminant. Test data include ML∼1–4 earthquakes and explosions observed by common seismographs in ten geologically diverse localities. Depending on the picking model and training data, binary classification using Pprob−Sprob with at least three stations can achieve approximately equivalent classification accuracy as P/S amplitude ratios without requiring any customization. Joint classification with P/S and Pprob−Sprob improves accuracy for most quality control scenarios. Pick probabilities are an efficient attribute to consider in explosion discrimination because they can be automated byproducts of event detection. They avoid the binary choice of picking or not picking weakly visible S waves common to explosions.

The Seismic RecordVol. 5(2)
Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory (US), Planetary Science Institute (US), University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US), Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Rice University (US)
U.S. Department of Energy, University of Nevada, Reno, National Nuclear Security Administration, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Sandia National Laboratories, Air Force Research Laboratory, Los Alamos National Laboratory
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
9.92
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.