Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study

ABSTRACT In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video‐recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10‐s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/hfm.70015
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.54

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study

Colleen Cheek, Nick Towle, Natália Ransolin, Robyn Clay‐Williams et al.
1 citations
Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service Industries
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
article

Identifying Hospital Built Environment Hazards Using HART and FRAM Frameworks: A Clinical Simulation Study

Colleen Cheek, Nick Towle, Natália Ransolin, Robyn Clay‐Williams, Matthew Wooler
article en
1 citations

Abstract

ABSTRACT In Situ simulations of work in health settings have been adopted to proactively identify hazards and manage risks related to the built environment (BE). In particular, video‐recorded simulations allow repeated reviews and debriefings of scenarios. This study evaluated BE hazards influencing clinical performance and patient outcomes based on video In Situ simulation of emergency scenarios before BE occupation. Four retrospective In Situ simulation and debriefing sessions of two emergency scenarios (ventricular fibrillation and acute myocardial infarction) were conducted with 12 medical and nursing staff participants in a hitherto new resuscitation bay of an Emergency Department (ED) in Australia. Data were analyzed according to the Hazard Assessment Remediation Tool (HART) and Functional Resonance Analysis Method (FRAM) by independent clinical and HFE researchers. Each 10‐s video fragment was associated with FRAM functions (i.e., tasks performed), aspects (e.g., input, output, preconditions), agents and variabilities of FRAM outputs to identify latent and active hazards according to the HART categories (i.e., slip/trip/fall/injury risk; impaired access to patient or equipment; obstructed path; poor visibility; and infection risk). HART categories were used to identify BE latent and active hazards, translated into potential and actual variabilities of the FRAM function outputs that arise from the suboptimal BE conditions. FRAM models of each emergency scenario were developed, 45 BE hazards were identified and 18 recommendations to the ED BE were linked to the precondition aspects of FRAM functions as a strategy to mitigate the output variabilities. Our two key contributions were (1) combining FRAM and HART as a methodology; and (2) using clinical simulations to identify BE hazards.

Human Factors and Ergonomics in Manufacturing & Service IndustriesVol. 35(4)
University of Tasmania (AU), Department of Health and Human Services (AU), Services Australia (AU), Macquarie University (AU)
Macquarie University
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
1.54
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.