Crisis Management of the Anti-quota Student Movement in Bangladesh: Governance Capacity in Misery

This study assesses the governance capacity of Bangladesh’s recently ousted government, the Bangladesh Awami League (BAL), led by Sheikh Hasina, on August 5, 2024, in managing the anti-quota student movement. This study finds major weaknesses in crisis management, including poor preparedness, coordination, and implementation by the last BAL government in Bangladesh. This study used a netnographic approach—a qualitative research method involving systematic observation and analysis to study online communities and cultures—and a literature review, which reveals that the Sheikh Hasina–led 16-year (2008–2024) administration failed to comprehend the anti-quota student movement crisis unfolding between July 1 and August 5, 2024. The 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement began as a student-led protest from July 1, 2024, against the government’s quota system, which involves reserved seats for various categories of people in public jobs. It later, throughout July 2024 until August 5, 2024, evolved into a broader pro-democracy uprising, especially after a violent crackdown by the government in July that killed many student protesters, becoming known as the July Revolution. The government’s inability to gauge public sentiment and respond effectively reflects weak political leadership, an authoritarian governance style, and a disconnect between state policies and citizen concerns. The overthrown government struggled to engage with public attitudes and behaviors, further weakening the crisis response. A key practical implication is the government’s failure to uphold sustainable development goal 16, which emphasizes peaceful, inclusive societies, access to justice, and strong institutions. The findings urge better governance strategies to effectively manage public dissent and political crises.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Developing Societies
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/0169796x251344338
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Social Science and Policy Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
10.68
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Crisis Management of the Anti-quota Student Movement in Bangladesh: Governance Capacity in Misery

Rifat Mahmud
2 citations
Journal of Developing Societies
Social Science and Policy Research
10.68
article

Crisis Management of the Anti-quota Student Movement in Bangladesh: Governance Capacity in Misery

Rifat Mahmud
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study assesses the governance capacity of Bangladesh’s recently ousted government, the Bangladesh Awami League (BAL), led by Sheikh Hasina, on August 5, 2024, in managing the anti-quota student movement. This study finds major weaknesses in crisis management, including poor preparedness, coordination, and implementation by the last BAL government in Bangladesh. This study used a netnographic approach—a qualitative research method involving systematic observation and analysis to study online communities and cultures—and a literature review, which reveals that the Sheikh Hasina–led 16-year (2008–2024) administration failed to comprehend the anti-quota student movement crisis unfolding between July 1 and August 5, 2024. The 2024 Bangladesh quota reform movement began as a student-led protest from July 1, 2024, against the government’s quota system, which involves reserved seats for various categories of people in public jobs. It later, throughout July 2024 until August 5, 2024, evolved into a broader pro-democracy uprising, especially after a violent crackdown by the government in July that killed many student protesters, becoming known as the July Revolution. The government’s inability to gauge public sentiment and respond effectively reflects weak political leadership, an authoritarian governance style, and a disconnect between state policies and citizen concerns. The overthrown government struggled to engage with public attitudes and behaviors, further weakening the crisis response. A key practical implication is the government’s failure to uphold sustainable development goal 16, which emphasizes peaceful, inclusive societies, access to justice, and strong institutions. The findings urge better governance strategies to effectively manage public dissent and political crises.

Journal of Developing SocietiesVol. 41(4)
University of Nottingham (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Social Science and Policy Research
10.68
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.