Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare the causative microorganisms and surgical treatment outcomes in PJI cases following UKA and TKA. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients (71 TKA and 11 UKA) who underwent surgical treatment for PJI between January 2017 and May 2024. PJI was diagnosed based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Treatment strategies included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Microbiological data were extracted from intraoperative cultures. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons. <b>Results</b>: Gram-positive organisms, primarily <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were isolated in all UKA PJIs. In contrast, the TKA group demonstrated greater microbial diversity, including Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial infections, and a higher rate of culture-negative cases (33.8% vs. 18.2%). DAIR was performed more frequently in UKA cases (72.7% vs. 28.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Recurrence rates following DAIR were similar in both groups (12.5% in UKA, 20.0% in TKA, <i>p</i> = 1.000). Two-stage revision resulted in no recurrence in UKA and a 9.8% recurrence rate in TKA patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: UKA PJIs appear to be microbiologically less complex than TKA PJI cases, with Gram-positive organisms predominating. Despite these differences, the outcomes of surgical treatment-both DAIR and two-stage revision-were comparable between groups. Standard PJI treatment principles may be applicable to both arthroplasty types; however, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Antibiotics
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/antibiotics14060585
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.01
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes

Şahan Güven, Mehmet Murat Akkaya, Ahmet Fırat, Metin Doğan et al.
1 citations
Antibiotics
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
article

Periprosthetic Joint Infection in Unicompartmental vs. Total Knee Arthroplasty: Microbiological Spectrum and Management Outcomes

Şahan Güven, Mehmet Murat Akkaya, Ahmet Fırat, Metin Doğan, Yasin Erdoğan, Ali Said Nazlıgül
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Background/Objectives</b>: Periprosthetic joint infection (PJI) is a severe complication following both total knee arthroplasty (TKA) and unicompartmental knee arthroplasty (UKA). While the microbiological profile of TKA PJI has been well characterized, limited data exist regarding UKA PJIs. This study aimed to compare the causative microorganisms and surgical treatment outcomes in PJI cases following UKA and TKA. <b>Methods</b>: This retrospective cohort study included 82 patients (71 TKA and 11 UKA) who underwent surgical treatment for PJI between January 2017 and May 2024. PJI was diagnosed based on the Musculoskeletal Infection Society (MSIS) criteria. Treatment strategies included debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR) or two-stage revision arthroplasty. Microbiological data were extracted from intraoperative cultures. Fisher's exact test and the Mann-Whitney U test were used for statistical comparisons. <b>Results</b>: Gram-positive organisms, primarily <i>Staphylococcus aureus</i> and coagulase-negative staphylococci, were isolated in all UKA PJIs. In contrast, the TKA group demonstrated greater microbial diversity, including Gram-negative bacilli, polymicrobial infections, and a higher rate of culture-negative cases (33.8% vs. 18.2%). DAIR was performed more frequently in UKA cases (72.7% vs. 28.2%, <i>p</i> = 0.002). Recurrence rates following DAIR were similar in both groups (12.5% in UKA, 20.0% in TKA, <i>p</i> = 1.000). Two-stage revision resulted in no recurrence in UKA and a 9.8% recurrence rate in TKA patients. <b>Conclusions</b>: UKA PJIs appear to be microbiologically less complex than TKA PJI cases, with Gram-positive organisms predominating. Despite these differences, the outcomes of surgical treatment-both DAIR and two-stage revision-were comparable between groups. Standard PJI treatment principles may be applicable to both arthroplasty types; however, larger prospective studies are needed to confirm these findings.

AntibioticsVol. 14(6)
Güven Hospital (TR), Yüksek İhtisas Üniversitesi (TR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Orthopedic Infections and Treatments
2.01
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.