Mind the Gap: A Psychological and Structural Perspective on Activist Shareholders’ Targeting of Women CEOs

An important challenge faced by women CEOs is that their firms tend to receive more shareholder activism than firms with men CEOs. Frequently, this activism represents attempts by shareholders to direct or override the decisions made by the firms’ leaders. The current paper integrates micro and macro perspectives to explore the factors influencing gender differences in shareholder activism. Drawing on social psychology research, we examine gender role expectations and perceived lack of fit as underlying psychological mechanisms, and we use industry gender type (i.e., men- or women-dominated industry) as an important structural factor that shapes the effects of these psychological mechanisms and women CEOs’ propensity to be targeted by shareholder activism. We test the hypotheses using archival data of shareholder activism at S&P 1500 companies. We also use two vignette-based experiments to examine the underlying mechanisms for why CEO gender relates to shareholder activism differently across industries. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Management
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/01492063251335563
Primary Topic
Gender Diversity and Inequality
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Mind the Gap: A Psychological and Structural Perspective on Activist Shareholders’ Targeting of Women CEOs

Samantha C. Paustian‐Underdahl, R. Michael Holmes, Janice Lam, Richard A. Devine et al.
Journal of Management
Gender Diversity and Inequality
article

Mind the Gap: A Psychological and Structural Perspective on Activist Shareholders’ Targeting of Women CEOs

Samantha C. Paustian‐Underdahl, R. Michael Holmes, Janice Lam, Richard A. Devine, Ivona Hideg, Bruce T. Lamont
article en

Abstract

An important challenge faced by women CEOs is that their firms tend to receive more shareholder activism than firms with men CEOs. Frequently, this activism represents attempts by shareholders to direct or override the decisions made by the firms’ leaders. The current paper integrates micro and macro perspectives to explore the factors influencing gender differences in shareholder activism. Drawing on social psychology research, we examine gender role expectations and perceived lack of fit as underlying psychological mechanisms, and we use industry gender type (i.e., men- or women-dominated industry) as an important structural factor that shapes the effects of these psychological mechanisms and women CEOs’ propensity to be targeted by shareholder activism. We test the hypotheses using archival data of shareholder activism at S&P 1500 companies. We also use two vignette-based experiments to examine the underlying mechanisms for why CEO gender relates to shareholder activism differently across industries. Implications and directions for future research are discussed.

Journal of Management
Florida State University (US), DePaul University (US), York University (CA), University of Johannesburg (ZA), University of Oxford (GB)
Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada
Openalex Percentile: Top 84%
Gender Diversity and Inequality
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Mind the Gap: A Psychological and Structural Perspective on Activist Shareholders’ Targeting of Women CEOs — Samantha C. Paustian‐Underdahl, R. Michael Holmes, et al. · Journal of Management (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS