Investigation of Stability and Control Shortcomings of the North American X-15

There is growing interest in the design of maneuvering high-speed aircraft to fly within or at the edge of the atmosphere. We identify and develop novel quasi-static vehicle screening methodologies, suitable for use during preliminary design, to better predict an incipient loss of control due to the dynamic effects of feedback. We validate these metrics by reverse-engineering Neil Armstrong’s 1962 loss of control and inadvertent atmospheric skip while piloting the X-15. In 1962, then-extant flight dynamics screening methods did not forecast likely troubles. We assemble and refine a collection of predictive metrics which operate upon basic quasi-static aerodynamic data and predict the confluence of lateral/directional stability and controllability issues which plagued the flown mission. These tools, which leverage McRuer’s “equivalent stability derivative” approach, enable future engineers to make proactive design changes which can avoid lateral/directional instabilities developing at high speeds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Aerospace
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/aerospace12060513
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.33

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Investigation of Stability and Control Shortcomings of the North American X-15

Timothy T. Takahashi, Ramana V. Grandhi, William P. Lorenzo
1 citations
Aerospace
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.33
article

Investigation of Stability and Control Shortcomings of the North American X-15

Timothy T. Takahashi, Ramana V. Grandhi, William P. Lorenzo
article en
1 citations

Abstract

There is growing interest in the design of maneuvering high-speed aircraft to fly within or at the edge of the atmosphere. We identify and develop novel quasi-static vehicle screening methodologies, suitable for use during preliminary design, to better predict an incipient loss of control due to the dynamic effects of feedback. We validate these metrics by reverse-engineering Neil Armstrong’s 1962 loss of control and inadvertent atmospheric skip while piloting the X-15. In 1962, then-extant flight dynamics screening methods did not forecast likely troubles. We assemble and refine a collection of predictive metrics which operate upon basic quasi-static aerodynamic data and predict the confluence of lateral/directional stability and controllability issues which plagued the flown mission. These tools, which leverage McRuer’s “equivalent stability derivative” approach, enable future engineers to make proactive design changes which can avoid lateral/directional instabilities developing at high speeds.

AerospaceVol. 12(6)
U.S. Air Force Institute of Technology (US)
U.S. Department of Defense, U.S. Department of Energy, Oak Ridge Associated Universities, Oak Ridge Institute for Science and Education, U.S. Air Force, Air Force Institute of Technology
Openalex Percentile: Top 22%
Computational Fluid Dynamics and Aerodynamics
1.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.