The face size illusion is specific to human faces

The faces of conspecifics are a critical feature of our social world. The visual system includes specialised processes for perceiving upright faces, which are not engaged to the same extent when faces are inverted (the face inversion effect). Recently, a face size illusion has been described in which upright faces are perceived as physically smaller than identical inverted faces. This effect appears highly specific to faces and does not occur for other stimuli, such as objects, hands, bodies and letters. We investigated whether this face size illusion is specific to faces in general or to human faces in particular. On each trial, participants saw two faces, one upright and one inverted and judged which face appeared physically larger. Across blocks, participants saw faces of humans, monkeys and cats. For human faces, there was a clear bias for upright faces to be perceived as smaller than inverted ones, consistent with previous findings. No such effect was found for the faces of cats or monkeys, for which there was a significant bias in the opposite direction. These results provide further evidence for the specificity of the face size illusion, showing that it is specific not just to faces, but to human faces.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/17470218251351017
Primary Topic
Face Recognition and Perception
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The face size illusion is specific to human faces

Eamonn Walsh, Matthew R. Longo, Denise Cadete, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè et al.
1 links
Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology
Face Recognition and Perception
article

The face size illusion is specific to human faces

Eamonn Walsh, Matthew R. Longo, Denise Cadete, Elisa Raffaella Ferrè, Lúcia Garrido, Stine Monsen
article en

Abstract

The faces of conspecifics are a critical feature of our social world. The visual system includes specialised processes for perceiving upright faces, which are not engaged to the same extent when faces are inverted (the face inversion effect). Recently, a face size illusion has been described in which upright faces are perceived as physically smaller than identical inverted faces. This effect appears highly specific to faces and does not occur for other stimuli, such as objects, hands, bodies and letters. We investigated whether this face size illusion is specific to faces in general or to human faces in particular. On each trial, participants saw two faces, one upright and one inverted and judged which face appeared physically larger. Across blocks, participants saw faces of humans, monkeys and cats. For human faces, there was a clear bias for upright faces to be perceived as smaller than inverted ones, consistent with previous findings. No such effect was found for the faces of cats or monkeys, for which there was a significant bias in the opposite direction. These results provide further evidence for the specificity of the face size illusion, showing that it is specific not just to faces, but to human faces.

Quarterly Journal of Experimental PsychologyVol. 79(3)
St George's, University of London (GB), City, University of London (GB), King's College London (GB), City St George's, University of London (GB), Birkbeck, University of London (GB)
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 88%
Face Recognition and Perception
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

The face size illusion is specific to human faces — Eamonn Walsh, Matthew R. Longo, et al. · Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS