Quantitative Estimation of Type Selection of Underground Lined Rock Caverns for Compressed Air Energy Storage Based on Numerical Simulations

Selecting the type of lined rock cavern (LRC) is a critical aspect in the construction of compressed air energy storage (CAES) plants. Present research on CAES has mainly focused on site selection, sealing performance, and stability of underground LRCs. Insufficient attention has been given to the selection of LRC type, which is a prerequisite for further detailed analyses of LRCs. To overcome this limitation, based on reliable numerical simulation, in this study, we simulate the mechanical responses of two popular types of LRCs: tunnel-type and silo-type LRCs. Parameter sensitivity analysis is then conducted based on the mechanical response, including parameters such as the deformation modulus of the surrounding rock mass, Poisson’s ratio, cohesion, friction angle, crustal stress, and lateral stress coefficient. Based on the simulated results, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is used to propose scoring systems for the two types of LRCs. This scoring system can be used for quantitative estimation of an appropriate LRC in CAES systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Energies
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/en18123024
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.46

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quantitative Estimation of Type Selection of Underground Lined Rock Caverns for Compressed Air Energy Storage Based on Numerical Simulations

Yutao Hu, Yue Xiang, Xinjin Wang, Ke Hong et al.
2 citations
Energies
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
article

Quantitative Estimation of Type Selection of Underground Lined Rock Caverns for Compressed Air Energy Storage Based on Numerical Simulations

Yutao Hu, Yue Xiang, Xinjin Wang, Ke Hong, Zhang Guo-hua, Zhuo Ma, Y. Ma
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Selecting the type of lined rock cavern (LRC) is a critical aspect in the construction of compressed air energy storage (CAES) plants. Present research on CAES has mainly focused on site selection, sealing performance, and stability of underground LRCs. Insufficient attention has been given to the selection of LRC type, which is a prerequisite for further detailed analyses of LRCs. To overcome this limitation, based on reliable numerical simulation, in this study, we simulate the mechanical responses of two popular types of LRCs: tunnel-type and silo-type LRCs. Parameter sensitivity analysis is then conducted based on the mechanical response, including parameters such as the deformation modulus of the surrounding rock mass, Poisson’s ratio, cohesion, friction angle, crustal stress, and lateral stress coefficient. Based on the simulated results, the analytical hierarchy process (AHP) method is used to propose scoring systems for the two types of LRCs. This scoring system can be used for quantitative estimation of an appropriate LRC in CAES systems.

EnergiesVol. 18(12)
China University of Geosciences (CN), China Energy Engineering Corporation (China) (CN), China Power Engineering Consulting Group (China) (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Hubei Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Integrated Energy Systems Optimization
1.46
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Quantitative Estimation of Type Selection of Underground Lined Rock Caverns for Compressed Air Energy Storage Based on Numerical Simulations — Yutao Hu, Yue Xiang, et al. · Energies (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS