How Can Inflation Contracts Discipline Central Bankers When Agents Are Learning?

ABSTRACT This paper studies, in a new Keynesian model with a positive optimal output gap, how to design linear inflation contracts to shape the central bank's incentive structure when private expectations are based on adaptive learning. In this model, under rational expectations, inflation contracts could only partially deal with the time‐inconsistency problem arising from incentives for the central bank to exploit the inflation‐output trade‐off induced by an “overambitious” output‐gap target. This is true even if the government incurs no cost related to such contracts, unlike in the Barro–Gordon framework. When agents are learning, their design should reflect the intertemporal trade‐off due to learning such that the optimal inflation penalty rate decreases from the high‐level set under optimal discretion and rational expectations and then approaches gradually, but does not equal, the low‐level set under optimal limited commitment and rational expectations as the learning gain tends to unity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of Economic Research
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/boer.12503
Primary Topic
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

How Can Inflation Contracts Discipline Central Bankers When Agents Are Learning?

Marine André, Meixing Dai
Bulletin of Economic Research
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
article

How Can Inflation Contracts Discipline Central Bankers When Agents Are Learning?

Marine André, Meixing Dai
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper studies, in a new Keynesian model with a positive optimal output gap, how to design linear inflation contracts to shape the central bank's incentive structure when private expectations are based on adaptive learning. In this model, under rational expectations, inflation contracts could only partially deal with the time‐inconsistency problem arising from incentives for the central bank to exploit the inflation‐output trade‐off induced by an “overambitious” output‐gap target. This is true even if the government incurs no cost related to such contracts, unlike in the Barro–Gordon framework. When agents are learning, their design should reflect the intertemporal trade‐off due to learning such that the optimal inflation penalty rate decreases from the high‐level set under optimal discretion and rational expectations and then approaches gradually, but does not equal, the low‐level set under optimal limited commitment and rational expectations as the learning gain tends to unity.

Bulletin of Economic ResearchVol. 78(1)
Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique (FR), Université de Strasbourg (FR), Université de Lorraine (FR)
Decent work and economic growth
Openalex Percentile: Top 80%
Monetary Policy and Economic Impact
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.