Foundation versus domain-specific models for left ventricular segmentation on cardiac ultrasound
The Segment Anything Model (SAM) was fine-tuned on the EchoNet-Dynamic dataset and evaluated on external transthoracic echocardiography (TTE) and Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) datasets from CAMUS (University Hospital of St Etienne) and Mayo Clinic (99 patients: 58 TTE, 41 POCUS). Fine-tuned SAM was superior or comparable to MedSAM. The fine-tuned SAM also outperformed EchoNet and U-Net models, demonstrating strong generalization, especially on apical 2-chamber (A2C) images (fine-tuned SAM vs. EchoNet: CAMUS-A2C: DSC 0.891 ± 0.040 vs. 0.752 ± 0.196, p < 0.0001) and POCUS (DSC 0.857 ± 0.047 vs. 0.667 ± 0.279, p < 0.0001). Additionally, SAM-enhanced workflow reduced annotation time by 50% (11.6 ± 4.5 sec vs. 5.7 ± 1.7 sec, p < 0.0001) while maintaining segmentation quality. We demonstrated an effective strategy for fine-tuning a vision foundation model for enhancing clinical workflow efficiency and supporting human-AI collaboration.
Authors
- Garvan C. Kane (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4308-6356)
- Imon Banerjee (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3327-8004)
- Chieh‐Ju Chao (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6155-0266)
- Justin Z. Wu
- Reza Arsanjani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7081-4286)
- Juan Farina (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5824-8485)
- Tiange Xiang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3311-1287)
- Wasan Kumar (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1361-9438)
- Jae K. Oh (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8303-5780)
- Curtis P. Langlotz (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8972-8051)
- Li Fei-Fei (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7481-0810)
- Yunqi Gu
- Ehsan Adeli
- Joseph Jeong
- Lalith Appari
- Rachael Wraith
Institutions
- Mayo Clinic (US)
- Mayo Clinic in Arizona (US)
- Arizona State University (US)
- Stanford University (US)
Publication Details
- Journal
- npj Digital Medicine
- Published
- 2025-06-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1038/s41746-025-01730-y
- Citations
- 2
- Primary Topic
- Cardiovascular Function and Risk Factors
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 2.78