Uncertainties in Visual Observations of Floating Riverine Plastic

Accurate and reliable monitoring data are crucial for the design of effective plastic pollution reduction and mitigation strategies. One common approach to monitor macroplastic (>0.5 cm) in rivers is the visual observation method, where floating plastics are counted from bridges to estimate plastic flux. However, this method lacks robust uncertainty analyses, resulting in unknown error margins and potentially suboptimal monitoring strategies. The goal of this study was to quantify these uncertainties. Three key design elements that contribute to uncertainty include (1) cross-sectional coverage, (2) observation time, and (3) observation frequency. Through a case study on the Dutch Rhine-Meuse delta, we show how these uncertainties can be quantified and that they can be used to make informed monitoring design decisions. We further demonstrate that the detection rate of true flux (recovery rate) is a key parameter to consider during uncertainty analyses. By integrating an uncertainty optimization step into the design process, the efficiency and effectiveness of monitoring protocols can be improved. These insights enhance data quality and reliability, ultimately supporting efforts to mitigate the environmental impacts of macroplastic pollution.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS ES&T Water
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsestwater.5c00223
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.51

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Uncertainties in Visual Observations of Floating Riverine Plastic

Frank P. L. Collas, Thijs Bosker, Tim van Emmerik, Martina G. Vijver et al.
3 citations
ACS ES&T Water
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
article

Uncertainties in Visual Observations of Floating Riverine Plastic

Frank P. L. Collas, Thijs Bosker, Tim van Emmerik, Martina G. Vijver, Yvette Mellink, Paul Vriend, Nadieh Kamp, Sylvia Drok, Felipe Moscoso Cruz
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Accurate and reliable monitoring data are crucial for the design of effective plastic pollution reduction and mitigation strategies. One common approach to monitor macroplastic (>0.5 cm) in rivers is the visual observation method, where floating plastics are counted from bridges to estimate plastic flux. However, this method lacks robust uncertainty analyses, resulting in unknown error margins and potentially suboptimal monitoring strategies. The goal of this study was to quantify these uncertainties. Three key design elements that contribute to uncertainty include (1) cross-sectional coverage, (2) observation time, and (3) observation frequency. Through a case study on the Dutch Rhine-Meuse delta, we show how these uncertainties can be quantified and that they can be used to make informed monitoring design decisions. We further demonstrate that the detection rate of true flux (recovery rate) is a key parameter to consider during uncertainty analyses. By integrating an uncertainty optimization step into the design process, the efficiency and effectiveness of monitoring protocols can be improved. These insights enhance data quality and reliability, ultimately supporting efforts to mitigate the environmental impacts of macroplastic pollution.

ACS ES&T WaterVol. 5(7)
Leiden University (NL), Radboud University Nijmegen (NL), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management (NL), Institute for Environmental Sciences (JP), State Key Laboratory of Hydrology-Water Resources and Hydraulic Engineering (CN), Radboud Institute for Molecular Life Sciences (NL), Aquatic Systems (United States) (US), Schlumberger (Netherlands) (NL), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
European Commission, Universiteit Leiden, Radboud Universiteit, Ministry of Infrastructure and Water Management, Wageningen University and Research, Rijkswaterstaat
Openalex Percentile: Top 19%
Microplastics and Plastic Pollution
1.51
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.