Assessing regression methods to estimate network-wide bicycle traffic volumes based on crowdsourced GPS and permanent counter data

GPS data offer an up-to-date, available, and easily processable database for bicycle traffic planning. Unlike permanent counters, they generally represent wide parts of the bicycle network. However, GPS data is derivable only from a subset of the cycling population and thus provides a limited overview of existing bicycle traffic volumes in a city at best. For planning or dimensioning of cycling infrastructure the data is only partially sufficient. Values such as the (annual) average daily number of bicycles (ADB/AADB) are more suitable. Using regression methods, GPS data in combination with (permanent) counter data can be utilized to model network-wide ADB. So far however, related studies mostly deal with only few counters in individual cities or metropolitan regions. Due to different modelling approaches and input variables, the results are neither comparable nor transferable. Therefore, no conclusion as to which models are most suited can be drawn. This study investigates the extrapolation of GPS data from a nationwide data set in Germany. First, six different types of regression models are trained based on the data set. Second, the trained models are utilized for network-wide AADB estimation in six municipalities. Thereby, this study provides a framework for comparable error metrics and investigates the suitability of the tested models for (1) estimation at permanent counters and (2) network-wide estimation. The models are divided into three classes: linear, tree-based and neural network models. We used 452 data points from permanent counters across Germany for model training. After assessing the model performances at the counters, they are applied to municipality-wide network sections. Comparing the overall performance, Support Vector Regression currently proves to be the most promising for extrapolating traffic volumes from GPS data to network-wide AADB. • Framework for comparable analysis of regression models for estimating (annual) average daily bicycles ((A)ADB) from crowdsourced GPS data in two fields of application: (1) at permanent counters and (2) network-wide • The paper highlights the importance of cross-validation of error metrics • Proof of concept for network-wide estimation of cycling volumes in municipalities without counters • Best performing model for network-wide estimation of cycling volumes from GPS data is Support Vector Regression • Random Forest and Gradient Bosting Models have to be regarded critical for this task

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcmr.2025.100073
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.53
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Assessing regression methods to estimate network-wide bicycle traffic volumes based on crowdsourced GPS and permanent counter data

Sven Lißner, Emely Richter, Joscha Raudszus
3 citations
Journal of Cycling and Micromobility Research
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
6.53
article

Assessing regression methods to estimate network-wide bicycle traffic volumes based on crowdsourced GPS and permanent counter data

Sven Lißner, Emely Richter, Joscha Raudszus
article en
3 citations

Abstract

GPS data offer an up-to-date, available, and easily processable database for bicycle traffic planning. Unlike permanent counters, they generally represent wide parts of the bicycle network. However, GPS data is derivable only from a subset of the cycling population and thus provides a limited overview of existing bicycle traffic volumes in a city at best. For planning or dimensioning of cycling infrastructure the data is only partially sufficient. Values such as the (annual) average daily number of bicycles (ADB/AADB) are more suitable. Using regression methods, GPS data in combination with (permanent) counter data can be utilized to model network-wide ADB. So far however, related studies mostly deal with only few counters in individual cities or metropolitan regions. Due to different modelling approaches and input variables, the results are neither comparable nor transferable. Therefore, no conclusion as to which models are most suited can be drawn. This study investigates the extrapolation of GPS data from a nationwide data set in Germany. First, six different types of regression models are trained based on the data set. Second, the trained models are utilized for network-wide AADB estimation in six municipalities. Thereby, this study provides a framework for comparable error metrics and investigates the suitability of the tested models for (1) estimation at permanent counters and (2) network-wide estimation. The models are divided into three classes: linear, tree-based and neural network models. We used 452 data points from permanent counters across Germany for model training. After assessing the model performances at the counters, they are applied to municipality-wide network sections. Comparing the overall performance, Support Vector Regression currently proves to be the most promising for extrapolating traffic volumes from GPS data to network-wide AADB. • Framework for comparable analysis of regression models for estimating (annual) average daily bicycles ((A)ADB) from crowdsourced GPS data in two fields of application: (1) at permanent counters and (2) network-wide • The paper highlights the importance of cross-validation of error metrics • Proof of concept for network-wide estimation of cycling volumes in municipalities without counters • Best performing model for network-wide estimation of cycling volumes from GPS data is Support Vector Regression • Random Forest and Gradient Bosting Models have to be regarded critical for this task

Journal of Cycling and Micromobility ResearchVol. 5
Technische Universität Dresden (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Human Mobility and Location-Based Analysis
6.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.