The effect of transglutaminase and ultrasound pre-treatment on the structure and digestibility of pea protein emulsion gels

This study examines the effects of ultrasound and transglutaminase pre-treatments on the structure, rheological properties, and digestibility of emulsion gels made from pea protein isolate and concentrate. Pre-treatments enhanced the elasticity and deformation resistance of gels made from pea protein isolate, with the combination of both treatments yielding the highest storage modulus. In contrast, emulsion gels from pea protein concentrate showed a more complex response, with untreated samples exhibiting higher storage modulus. These differences reflect variations in gelation behavior between isolates and concentrates, likely due to differences in composition and extraction processes. Protein digestibility, assessed using the o-phthalaldehyde assay, showed significant differences between pre-treatments, but the impact was less pronounced compared to the difference between gels made from isolate and concentrate. Gels made from pea protein isolate had a hydrolysis degree of 77%, while those from pea protein concentrate had 48%, with this difference mainly attributed to the higher amounts of starch and fiber in the concentrate, which affected both the gel structure and digestibility. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics revealed lower glucose release in transglutaminase-treated gels made from pea protein concentrate and lower glycine release from ultrasound and transglutaminase-treated gels made from pea protein isolate during gastric digestion. However, no significant differences were observed after intestinal digestion, indicating no major limitations in nutrient release due to processing. Overall, these findings highlight the role of protein source and processing methods in influencing rheological properties and nutrient bioavailability in protein systems. • Pea protein isolate and pea protein concentrate show distinct gelation behaviors • Ultrasound pre-treatment enhances elasticity and oil droplet distribution in gels • Pea protein concentrate gels behave differently due to starch and fiber content. • Type of raw material influences the protein digestibility of the gels. • NMR analysis reveals differences in glucose and glycine release during digestion.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Food Hydrocolloids
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodhyd.2025.111620
Citations
5
Primary Topic
Proteins in Food Systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.81

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The effect of transglutaminase and ultrasound pre-treatment on the structure and digestibility of pea protein emulsion gels

Jaqueline Auer, Hanna Eriksson Röhnisch, M. Johansson, Anders Högberg et al.
5 citations
Food Hydrocolloids
Proteins in Food Systems
5.81
article

The effect of transglutaminase and ultrasound pre-treatment on the structure and digestibility of pea protein emulsion gels

Jaqueline Auer, Hanna Eriksson Röhnisch, M. Johansson, Anders Högberg, Marina Marinea, Galia Zamaratskaia, Maud Langton, Marie Alminger, Sarah Heupl
article en
5 citations

Abstract

This study examines the effects of ultrasound and transglutaminase pre-treatments on the structure, rheological properties, and digestibility of emulsion gels made from pea protein isolate and concentrate. Pre-treatments enhanced the elasticity and deformation resistance of gels made from pea protein isolate, with the combination of both treatments yielding the highest storage modulus. In contrast, emulsion gels from pea protein concentrate showed a more complex response, with untreated samples exhibiting higher storage modulus. These differences reflect variations in gelation behavior between isolates and concentrates, likely due to differences in composition and extraction processes. Protein digestibility, assessed using the o-phthalaldehyde assay, showed significant differences between pre-treatments, but the impact was less pronounced compared to the difference between gels made from isolate and concentrate. Gels made from pea protein isolate had a hydrolysis degree of 77%, while those from pea protein concentrate had 48%, with this difference mainly attributed to the higher amounts of starch and fiber in the concentrate, which affected both the gel structure and digestibility. Nuclear magnetic resonance-based metabolomics revealed lower glucose release in transglutaminase-treated gels made from pea protein concentrate and lower glycine release from ultrasound and transglutaminase-treated gels made from pea protein isolate during gastric digestion. However, no significant differences were observed after intestinal digestion, indicating no major limitations in nutrient release due to processing. Overall, these findings highlight the role of protein source and processing methods in influencing rheological properties and nutrient bioavailability in protein systems. • Pea protein isolate and pea protein concentrate show distinct gelation behaviors • Ultrasound pre-treatment enhances elasticity and oil droplet distribution in gels • Pea protein concentrate gels behave differently due to starch and fiber content. • Type of raw material influences the protein digestibility of the gels. • NMR analysis reveals differences in glucose and glycine release during digestion.

Food HydrocolloidsVol. 169
Swedish University of Agricultural Sciences (SE), E.ON Sverige (Sweden) (SE), University of Applied Sciences Upper Austria (AT), Chalmers University of Technology (SE)
Svenska Forskningsrådet Formas
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Proteins in Food Systems
5.81
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.