BP and Kidney Disease Progression in Advanced CKD

Key Points Higher BP was associated with a higher risk of kidney disease progression in patients with CKD G3b–G5. A stronger association observed with time-updated BP emphasizes the importance of consistently maintaining optimal BP over time. Further validation through well-designed clinical trials is warranted to determine optimal BP in patients with CKD. Background BP control is important in the management of CKD. However, in patients with advanced CKD, the benefits of BP control in delaying the progression of CKD remain uncertain. Methods We analyzed 2939 participants with CKD G3b–G5 (eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) without KRT from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study and the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD (phase 1). The main predictors were baseline and time-updated systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. The primary outcome was a composite kidney outcome of ≥50% decline in eGFR from baseline measurement or the initiation of KRT. In the analyses, multivariate cause-specific hazards models and marginal structural models were fitted for baseline and time-updated BPs, respectively. Results During 17755 person-years of follow-up (median, 4.7 years), the composite outcome occurred in 1627 (55%) participants. Compared with baseline SBP <120 mm Hg, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for 120–129, 130–139, and ≥140 mm Hg were 1.33 (1.15 to 1.54), 1.48 (1.27 to 1.72), and 1.82 (1.58 to 2.10), respectively. This association was more evident in analysis with time-updated SBP, where the corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.29 (1.09 to 1.54), 1.75 (1.46 to 2.10), and 2.79 (2.36 to 3.29), respectively. Furthermore, the slopes of eGFR decline were –1.20 (–1.36 to –1.04), –1.77 (–1.97 to –1.57), –2.11 (–2.35 to –1.88), and –2.48 (–2.70 to –2.27) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for respective baseline SBP categories. Additional analyses with diastolic BP also showed similar results. Conclusions In patients with advanced CKD, higher BP levels were associated with a higher risk of CKD progression.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.2215/cjn.0000000760
Citations
6
Primary Topic
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
8.33
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

BP and Kidney Disease Progression in Advanced CKD

Shin‐Wook Kang, Mahboob Rahman, Seung Hyeok Han, Kook‐Hwan Oh et al.
6 citations
Clinical Journal of the American Society of Nephrology
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
8.33
article

BP and Kidney Disease Progression in Advanced CKD

Shin‐Wook Kang, Mahboob Rahman, Seung Hyeok Han, Kook‐Hwan Oh, Tae Ik Chang, Tae‐Hyun Yoo, Jordana B. Cohen, Amanda H. Anderson, Cheol Ho Park, Hyung Woo Kim, Wei Peter Yang, Jung Tak Park
article en
6 citations

Abstract

Key Points Higher BP was associated with a higher risk of kidney disease progression in patients with CKD G3b–G5. A stronger association observed with time-updated BP emphasizes the importance of consistently maintaining optimal BP over time. Further validation through well-designed clinical trials is warranted to determine optimal BP in patients with CKD. Background BP control is important in the management of CKD. However, in patients with advanced CKD, the benefits of BP control in delaying the progression of CKD remain uncertain. Methods We analyzed 2939 participants with CKD G3b–G5 (eGFR <45 ml/min per 1.73 m 2 ) without KRT from the Chronic Renal Insufficiency Cohort study and the KoreaN Cohort Study for Outcome in Patients with CKD (phase 1). The main predictors were baseline and time-updated systolic BP (SBP) and diastolic BP. The primary outcome was a composite kidney outcome of ≥50% decline in eGFR from baseline measurement or the initiation of KRT. In the analyses, multivariate cause-specific hazards models and marginal structural models were fitted for baseline and time-updated BPs, respectively. Results During 17755 person-years of follow-up (median, 4.7 years), the composite outcome occurred in 1627 (55%) participants. Compared with baseline SBP <120 mm Hg, the hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) for 120–129, 130–139, and ≥140 mm Hg were 1.33 (1.15 to 1.54), 1.48 (1.27 to 1.72), and 1.82 (1.58 to 2.10), respectively. This association was more evident in analysis with time-updated SBP, where the corresponding hazard ratios (95% confidence intervals) were 1.29 (1.09 to 1.54), 1.75 (1.46 to 2.10), and 2.79 (2.36 to 3.29), respectively. Furthermore, the slopes of eGFR decline were –1.20 (–1.36 to –1.04), –1.77 (–1.97 to –1.57), –2.11 (–2.35 to –1.88), and –2.48 (–2.70 to –2.27) ml/min per 1.73 m 2 per year for respective baseline SBP categories. Additional analyses with diastolic BP also showed similar results. Conclusions In patients with advanced CKD, higher BP levels were associated with a higher risk of CKD progression.

Clinical Journal of the American Society of NephrologyVol. 20(9)
Tulane University (US), Manpower Demonstration Research Corporation (US), Seoul National University (KR), Yonsei University (KR), University Hospitals of Cleveland (US), National Health Insurance Service (KR), Case Western Reserve University (US), University of Pennsylvania (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Blood Pressure and Hypertension Studies
8.33
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.