Coercion in the Courtroom

Despite a significant growth of scientific knowledge on wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice, the phenomenon of false guilty pleas remains largely understudied in Canada. Drawing from data obtained through the responses of a questionnaire administered to 55 defendants and 11 in-depth semi-directed interviews, this article explores the profile of the individuals who enter false guilty pleas and the reasons why they do so. The context and circumstances behind false guilty pleas are ranked by their prevalence (in the survey) and describe with interviewees stories. Finally, the article discusses the perception of the person entering a false guilty plea regarding the coerciveness or voluntariness of their decision.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Wrongful Conviction Law Review
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.29173/wclawr124
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Jury Decision Making Processes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
15.98
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Coercion in the Courtroom

Chloé Leclerc, Elsa Euvrard, Meritxell Abellan-Almenara
1 citations
The Wrongful Conviction Law Review
Jury Decision Making Processes
15.98
article

Coercion in the Courtroom

Chloé Leclerc, Elsa Euvrard, Meritxell Abellan-Almenara
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Despite a significant growth of scientific knowledge on wrongful convictions and miscarriages of justice, the phenomenon of false guilty pleas remains largely understudied in Canada. Drawing from data obtained through the responses of a questionnaire administered to 55 defendants and 11 in-depth semi-directed interviews, this article explores the profile of the individuals who enter false guilty pleas and the reasons why they do so. The context and circumstances behind false guilty pleas are ranked by their prevalence (in the survey) and describe with interviewees stories. Finally, the article discusses the perception of the person entering a false guilty plea regarding the coerciveness or voluntariness of their decision.

The Wrongful Conviction Law ReviewVol. 6(1)
Université Laval (CA), Université de Montréal (CA)
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
Jury Decision Making Processes
15.98
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.