Complexity Theoretical Research and Interaction Design Framework for Driving Scenarios

Based on the Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering (MMESE) theory, this paper dissects the complexity in driving scenarios into the cognitive complexity of drivers, system interface complexity, and environment complexity, constructs a complexity framework within driving scenarios, and explores the interplay among these different components. Additionally, this paper investigates drivers' perceptions of driving environment complexity, system interface complexity, and various driving information through a questionnaire survey. The results indicate that respondents generally believe that both environment complexity and system interface complexity contribute to an increase in their cognitive complexity, with dynamic traffic environments (such as pedestrians and vehicles) having the greatest impact on driver cognition. Furthermore, respondents consider navigation information and dynamic traffic information to be more important for driving. Based on these findings, this paper proposes an intelligent cockpit AR-HUD information design framework, providing a reference for interface design in future intelligent cockpit systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2024-11-29
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1145/3726010.3726080
Primary Topic
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Complexity Theoretical Research and Interaction Design Framework for Driving Scenarios

X. T. Huang
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
article

Complexity Theoretical Research and Interaction Design Framework for Driving Scenarios

X. T. Huang
article en

Abstract

Based on the Man-Machine-Environment System Engineering (MMESE) theory, this paper dissects the complexity in driving scenarios into the cognitive complexity of drivers, system interface complexity, and environment complexity, constructs a complexity framework within driving scenarios, and explores the interplay among these different components. Additionally, this paper investigates drivers' perceptions of driving environment complexity, system interface complexity, and various driving information through a questionnaire survey. The results indicate that respondents generally believe that both environment complexity and system interface complexity contribute to an increase in their cognitive complexity, with dynamic traffic environments (such as pedestrians and vehicles) having the greatest impact on driver cognition. Furthermore, respondents consider navigation information and dynamic traffic information to be more important for driving. Based on these findings, this paper proposes an intelligent cockpit AR-HUD information design framework, providing a reference for interface design in future intelligent cockpit systems.

Tongji University (CN)
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 63%
Human-Automation Interaction and Safety
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Complexity Theoretical Research and Interaction Design Framework for Driving Scenarios — X. T. Huang · (2024) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS