АНАЛІЗ ДОМІНУЮЧИХ ФАКТОРІВ ЕКОЛОГІЧНИХ РИЗИКІВ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ТА ЇХ ВПЛИВ НА ФІНАНСОВИЙ СТАН

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the key environmental risk factors associated with the operation of oil and gas enterprises. It identifies the complex, interrelated nature of these risks and emphasizes that their mutual interaction and cumulative effect significantly influence the financial sustainability and overall stability of such enterprises. Particular attention is given to how these environmental risks evolve within the context of modern production processes and how they affect various organizational and technical aspects of industrial operations. To better understand and manage these risks, the authors have conducted a detailed study of the dominant environmental factors, which led to the development of a coordinate matrix outlining the probabilities and potential consequences of hazardous events. This matrix serves as the foundation for creating logical functions that help structure and facilitate the internal exchange of information, promoting a unified perception of environmental threats among company personnel and enhancing risk awareness at all levels of management. Furthermore, the article proposes a structured classification system for dominant environmental risks in oil and gas operations, grounded in the ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle. This classification reflects the balance between acceptable risk levels and the practicality of implementing preventive measures, taking into account both material and intangible cost-effectiveness. Through the application of this methodology, the authors were able to identify and prioritize the most critical risk factors from a broad set of environmental threats typical for the oil and gas sector. Among these, the following were highlighted as particularly significant: personnel errors leading to violation of technological parameters, inadequate reliability of energy supply and automation systems, unpredictability of well behavior during initial operations, risk of spontaneous ignition of industrial equipment, and substandard lightning protection systems. By establishing a clear classification and prioritization approach, the proposed framework not only enhances decision-making transparency but also serves as a practical tool for knowledge sharing among industry professionals. This approach supports more effective environmental risk management by ensuring consistent evaluation criteria and communication standards across different operational units. Ultimately, the article contributes to the development of a more resilient environmental risk culture in oil and gas enterprises, aiming for greater sustainability and operational safety.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences
Published
2025-05-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.31891/2307-5740-2025-342-3(1)-4
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Risk and Safety Analysis
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.40
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

АНАЛІЗ ДОМІНУЮЧИХ ФАКТОРІВ ЕКОЛОГІЧНИХ РИЗИКІВ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ТА ЇХ ВПЛИВ НА ФІНАНСОВИЙ СТАН

Iryna Fadyeyeva
1 citations
Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciences
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
article

АНАЛІЗ ДОМІНУЮЧИХ ФАКТОРІВ ЕКОЛОГІЧНИХ РИЗИКІВ ДІЯЛЬНОСТІ ПІДПРИЄМСТВ ТА ЇХ ВПЛИВ НА ФІНАНСОВИЙ СТАН

Iryna Fadyeyeva
article en
1 citations

Abstract

The article provides a comprehensive analysis of the key environmental risk factors associated with the operation of oil and gas enterprises. It identifies the complex, interrelated nature of these risks and emphasizes that their mutual interaction and cumulative effect significantly influence the financial sustainability and overall stability of such enterprises. Particular attention is given to how these environmental risks evolve within the context of modern production processes and how they affect various organizational and technical aspects of industrial operations. To better understand and manage these risks, the authors have conducted a detailed study of the dominant environmental factors, which led to the development of a coordinate matrix outlining the probabilities and potential consequences of hazardous events. This matrix serves as the foundation for creating logical functions that help structure and facilitate the internal exchange of information, promoting a unified perception of environmental threats among company personnel and enhancing risk awareness at all levels of management. Furthermore, the article proposes a structured classification system for dominant environmental risks in oil and gas operations, grounded in the ALARP (As Low As Reasonably Practicable) principle. This classification reflects the balance between acceptable risk levels and the practicality of implementing preventive measures, taking into account both material and intangible cost-effectiveness. Through the application of this methodology, the authors were able to identify and prioritize the most critical risk factors from a broad set of environmental threats typical for the oil and gas sector. Among these, the following were highlighted as particularly significant: personnel errors leading to violation of technological parameters, inadequate reliability of energy supply and automation systems, unpredictability of well behavior during initial operations, risk of spontaneous ignition of industrial equipment, and substandard lightning protection systems. By establishing a clear classification and prioritization approach, the proposed framework not only enhances decision-making transparency but also serves as a practical tool for knowledge sharing among industry professionals. This approach supports more effective environmental risk management by ensuring consistent evaluation criteria and communication standards across different operational units. Ultimately, the article contributes to the development of a more resilient environmental risk culture in oil and gas enterprises, aiming for greater sustainability and operational safety.

Herald of Khmelnytskyi National University Economic sciencesVol. 342(3(1))
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Risk and Safety Analysis
1.40
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.