The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces

Pooling individual samples could be an efficient approach for large-scale population-based microbiome studies. However, it is unknown whether pooled samples accurately reflect the microbiome composition and diversity obtained from individual samples. This study investigated the impact of various pooling methods on the observed fecal microbiome of preweaned piglets. Individual fecal samples were collected from 10 litters of day-old piglets (N = 137) and 10 litters of 20-day-old piglets (N = 121), as well as pen-floor samples from the same litters. The individually collected samples were processed individually and also used to create pools of both raw feces and extracted DNA. Individual samples, raw feces pools, DNA pools, and pen-floor samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbial profile in pen-floor samples from litters of preweaned piglets was very different from individual piglet samples within the pen; thus, they may not be suitable for litter-level piglet microbiome studies. However, overall microbial diversity and composition from DNA and feces pools were comparable to individual samples, despite potentially underestimating some low-abundance or low-prevalence taxa. These results suggest that pooling can be used as an efficient and cost-effective approach to characterize litter-level microbial profiles for current and future population-level microbiome research in preweaned piglet populations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/femsec/fiaf058
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Gut microbiota and health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.61

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces

Noelle Noyes, Maria Pieters, Mark Schwartz, Tara N. Gaire et al.
2 citations
FEMS Microbiology Ecology
Gut microbiota and health
1.61
article

The impact of pooling on the observed microbiome profile of preweaned piglet feces

Noelle Noyes, Maria Pieters, Mark Schwartz, Tara N. Gaire, Randall S. Singer, J. Michael Young, Thomas Wehri
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Pooling individual samples could be an efficient approach for large-scale population-based microbiome studies. However, it is unknown whether pooled samples accurately reflect the microbiome composition and diversity obtained from individual samples. This study investigated the impact of various pooling methods on the observed fecal microbiome of preweaned piglets. Individual fecal samples were collected from 10 litters of day-old piglets (N = 137) and 10 litters of 20-day-old piglets (N = 121), as well as pen-floor samples from the same litters. The individually collected samples were processed individually and also used to create pools of both raw feces and extracted DNA. Individual samples, raw feces pools, DNA pools, and pen-floor samples were subjected to 16S rRNA gene sequencing. The microbial profile in pen-floor samples from litters of preweaned piglets was very different from individual piglet samples within the pen; thus, they may not be suitable for litter-level piglet microbiome studies. However, overall microbial diversity and composition from DNA and feces pools were comparable to individual samples, despite potentially underestimating some low-abundance or low-prevalence taxa. These results suggest that pooling can be used as an efficient and cost-effective approach to characterize litter-level microbial profiles for current and future population-level microbiome research in preweaned piglet populations.

FEMS Microbiology EcologyVol. 101(6)
University of Minnesota (US), Schwartz Laser Eye Center (US)
U.S. Department of Agriculture, University of Minnesota, National Institute of Food and Agriculture
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Gut microbiota and health
1.61
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.