Universality in the Mechanical Behavior of Vertex Models for Biological Tissues

Simple vertex models, where the cell shape is defined as a network of edges and vertices, have made useful predictions about the collective behavior of confluent biological tissues, including rigidity transitions. Quite a few different versions of vertex models have appeared in the literature, and they propose substantial differences in how the mechanical energy depends on vertex positions, yet all seem to make correct predictions. To understand how this is possible, we search for universality in the emergent mechanical behavior—including the shear modulus defined in the limit of zero-strain rate and the viscoelastic response at finite strain rates—of six different vertex models. We identify a class of models with a well-defined shear modulus, and demonstrate that these models all exhibit a crossover from a soft or floppy regime to a stiff regime. We find that the observed cell shape index (the ratio of the cell perimeter to the square root of the cell area) is a good observable order parameter for the crossover, even though the input model parameter that controls the crossover is different in each model. We also find that the finite-strain-rate viscoelastic response of all models exhibits a universal scaling with frequency, following the Zener model in the rigid phase and Burgers model in the fluid phase. The observation that a geometric observable like cell shape governs the transition, rather than a topological observable such as coordination number, suggests that second-order rigidity may be a good framework for explaining this universality. It generates an empirical prediction that a broad class of vertex models with second-order rigidity transitions should also exhibit these universal mechanical features, and helps to explain why many different vertex models are able to robustly predict these features in experiments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PRX Life
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1103/9ktk-6rqc
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Elasticity and Material Modeling
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
2.02
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Universality in the Mechanical Behavior of Vertex Models for Biological Tissues

Sadjad Arzash, M. Lisa Manning, Elizabeth Lawson-Keister, Karl J. Friston
3 citations
PRX Life
Elasticity and Material Modeling
2.02
article

Universality in the Mechanical Behavior of Vertex Models for Biological Tissues

Sadjad Arzash, M. Lisa Manning, Elizabeth Lawson-Keister, Karl J. Friston
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Simple vertex models, where the cell shape is defined as a network of edges and vertices, have made useful predictions about the collective behavior of confluent biological tissues, including rigidity transitions. Quite a few different versions of vertex models have appeared in the literature, and they propose substantial differences in how the mechanical energy depends on vertex positions, yet all seem to make correct predictions. To understand how this is possible, we search for universality in the emergent mechanical behavior—including the shear modulus defined in the limit of zero-strain rate and the viscoelastic response at finite strain rates—of six different vertex models. We identify a class of models with a well-defined shear modulus, and demonstrate that these models all exhibit a crossover from a soft or floppy regime to a stiff regime. We find that the observed cell shape index (the ratio of the cell perimeter to the square root of the cell area) is a good observable order parameter for the crossover, even though the input model parameter that controls the crossover is different in each model. We also find that the finite-strain-rate viscoelastic response of all models exhibits a universal scaling with frequency, following the Zener model in the rigid phase and Burgers model in the fluid phase. The observation that a geometric observable like cell shape governs the transition, rather than a topological observable such as coordination number, suggests that second-order rigidity may be a good framework for explaining this universality. It generates an empirical prediction that a broad class of vertex models with second-order rigidity transitions should also exhibit these universal mechanical features, and helps to explain why many different vertex models are able to robustly predict these features in experiments.

PRX LifeVol. 3(3)
University of the Sciences (US), California University of Pennsylvania (US), Syracuse University (US), Philadelphia University (US)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Elasticity and Material Modeling
2.02
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.