Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes

The University of Virginia (UVA) Health’s Population Health Department advances health equity by expanding access to patient-centered care and improving health outcomes. One of their programs, Interactive Home Monitoring (IHM), provides follow-up care for patients discharged from the UVA Medical Center through remote patient monitoring protocols, proactive care coordination strategies, and patient engagement practices. This paper aims to inform quality improvement for IHM by understanding the value of the program through currently collected metrics (e.g. readmissions, emergency department visits, length of stay) and through creating a more holistic understanding of value from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Defining and demonstrating the value of IHM is currently challenging due to the ambiguous nature of value and limitations in data collection and reporting, including data integration and capturing patient perspectives. This paper evaluates IHM’s effectiveness using statistical methods to compare outcomes between enrolled patients and those eligible but not enrolled. This addresses the challenges posed by limited data collection and reporting in defining and demonstrating program value. Through qualitative content analysis of interview notes and Mann-Whitney tests of datasets on the Locus platform, we define value for IHM. The findings aim to establish a framework for defining and assessing value in population health programs, aligning stakeholder priorities with program outcomes. This analysis provides actionable insights to enhance program effectiveness and measure value and could be used as a framework for similar population health programs.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds65500.2025.11021196
Primary Topic
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes

Andrew J. Gregory, G. Fry, Rupa S. Valdez, Jose A. Valdez et al.
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
article

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes

Andrew J. Gregory, G. Fry, Rupa S. Valdez, Jose A. Valdez, Zeena H. El-Mufti, Rachel J. Huh, Emily M. Toler
article en

Abstract

The University of Virginia (UVA) Health’s Population Health Department advances health equity by expanding access to patient-centered care and improving health outcomes. One of their programs, Interactive Home Monitoring (IHM), provides follow-up care for patients discharged from the UVA Medical Center through remote patient monitoring protocols, proactive care coordination strategies, and patient engagement practices. This paper aims to inform quality improvement for IHM by understanding the value of the program through currently collected metrics (e.g. readmissions, emergency department visits, length of stay) and through creating a more holistic understanding of value from multiple stakeholder perspectives. Defining and demonstrating the value of IHM is currently challenging due to the ambiguous nature of value and limitations in data collection and reporting, including data integration and capturing patient perspectives. This paper evaluates IHM’s effectiveness using statistical methods to compare outcomes between enrolled patients and those eligible but not enrolled. This addresses the challenges posed by limited data collection and reporting in defining and demonstrating program value. Through qualitative content analysis of interview notes and Mann-Whitney tests of datasets on the Locus platform, we define value for IHM. The findings aim to establish a framework for defining and assessing value in population health programs, aligning stakeholder priorities with program outcomes. This analysis provides actionable insights to enhance program effectiveness and measure value and could be used as a framework for similar population health programs.

University of Virginia Health System (US), University of Virginia Medical Center (US), University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 81%
Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Defining Value in Population Health: Evaluating Program Impact and Outcomes — Andrew J. Gregory, G. Fry, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS