Trusted Artificial Intelligence in Life-Critical and High-Risk Environments

With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into autonomous decision-making, ensuring trust in these complex systems is crucial, particularly in life-critical applications where failures can be catastrophic. Existing AI-driven autonomous technology often operates under high uncertainty due to its black-box nature, demanding greater accountability, reliability, and transparency for mission success. This paper proposes a generalizable systems engineering framework for building trust in autonomous systems, demonstrated in the context of minefield traversal, a life-critical control problem. By integrating explainable statistical models into reinforcement learning (RL), this approach evaluates subsystem accuracy and uncertainty in real time, significantly enhancing reliability. Mine detection is supported by two independent, imperfect predictors, an AI model and a human evaluator, each affected differently by varying environmental conditions. Statistical methods quantify prediction reliability, while RL optimizes decisions under uncertainty. Embedding explainable statistics into RL decision-making ensures interpretable outcomes, robust risk-based monitoring, and adaptability to changing operational parameters. This approach was tested through an agent-based simulation where AI and human detection systems collaboratively navigated uncertain minefields. Results indicate improved decision transparency, AI adaptability, and real-time risk management. Explicitly designed for generalizability, this framework presents a scalable method to establish reliable autonomous systems across various safety-critical domains. Future work will refine trust metrics and explore applications in a broader context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds65500.2025.11021194
Primary Topic
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Trusted Artificial Intelligence in Life-Critical and High-Risk Environments

Andrew Evans, Hunter B. Moore, Sami Saliba, Jean M. Abel et al.
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
article

Trusted Artificial Intelligence in Life-Critical and High-Risk Environments

Andrew Evans, Hunter B. Moore, Sami Saliba, Jean M. Abel, William T. Scherer, Matthew W. Burkett, Helen Palmer, Stephen Durham
article en

Abstract

With the growing integration of artificial intelligence (AI) into autonomous decision-making, ensuring trust in these complex systems is crucial, particularly in life-critical applications where failures can be catastrophic. Existing AI-driven autonomous technology often operates under high uncertainty due to its black-box nature, demanding greater accountability, reliability, and transparency for mission success. This paper proposes a generalizable systems engineering framework for building trust in autonomous systems, demonstrated in the context of minefield traversal, a life-critical control problem. By integrating explainable statistical models into reinforcement learning (RL), this approach evaluates subsystem accuracy and uncertainty in real time, significantly enhancing reliability. Mine detection is supported by two independent, imperfect predictors, an AI model and a human evaluator, each affected differently by varying environmental conditions. Statistical methods quantify prediction reliability, while RL optimizes decisions under uncertainty. Embedding explainable statistics into RL decision-making ensures interpretable outcomes, robust risk-based monitoring, and adaptability to changing operational parameters. This approach was tested through an agent-based simulation where AI and human detection systems collaboratively navigated uncertain minefields. Results indicate improved decision transparency, AI adaptability, and real-time risk management. Explicitly designed for generalizability, this framework presents a scalable method to establish reliable autonomous systems across various safety-critical domains. Future work will refine trust metrics and explore applications in a broader context.

University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Healthcare Technology and Patient Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.