Lost in Compression: Who’s Heard and Who’s Blurred in Digital Voice Communication?

Digital communication has become essential post-COVID-19, yet speech transmission technologies introduce unintended distortions that may disproportionately affect certain voices. This study investigates whether three widely used compression and decompression algorithms (codecs)—OPUS, Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR), and CODEC2—introduce structural bias by differentially degrading male and female voices. Using a dataset of 2,953 speakers, we applied 14 audio quality metrics to assess differences in voice degradation across various bitrate settings. Our results reveal consistent, metric-dependent disparities by sex, with OPUS showing a shift in bias at mid-range bitrates, and AMR and CODEC2 exhibiting persistent but variable bias across all settings. Results indicate that female voices experience greater degradation across multiple measures, potentially impacting listener perception and communication clarity. These findings highlight the importance of codec design in equitable voice representation and call for greater attention to inclusion in speech processing systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Published
2025-05-02
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1109/sieds65500.2025.11021157
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Digital Communication and Language
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.94
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lost in Compression: Who’s Heard and Who’s Blurred in Digital Voice Communication?

Jad A. Atweh, Nguyễn Cát Hồ, Matthew L. Bolton, M. X. Sullivan et al.
1 citations
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
article

Lost in Compression: Who’s Heard and Who’s Blurred in Digital Voice Communication?

Jad A. Atweh, Nguyễn Cát Hồ, Matthew L. Bolton, M. X. Sullivan, Elizabeth J. Recktenwald, Lucas Vallarino
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Digital communication has become essential post-COVID-19, yet speech transmission technologies introduce unintended distortions that may disproportionately affect certain voices. This study investigates whether three widely used compression and decompression algorithms (codecs)—OPUS, Adaptive Multi-Rate (AMR), and CODEC2—introduce structural bias by differentially degrading male and female voices. Using a dataset of 2,953 speakers, we applied 14 audio quality metrics to assess differences in voice degradation across various bitrate settings. Our results reveal consistent, metric-dependent disparities by sex, with OPUS showing a shift in bias at mid-range bitrates, and AMR and CODEC2 exhibiting persistent but variable bias across all settings. Results indicate that female voices experience greater degradation across multiple measures, potentially impacting listener perception and communication clarity. These findings highlight the importance of codec design in equitable voice representation and call for greater attention to inclusion in speech processing systems.

University of Virginia (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Digital Communication and Language
1.94
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Lost in Compression: Who’s Heard and Who’s Blurred in Digital Voice Communication? — Jad A. Atweh, Nguyễn Cát Hồ, et al. · (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS