Metabarcoding-based characterization of soil nematode communities to assess soil health in viticulture

• Organic viticulture enhances soil nematode diversity and network connectivity. • Higher Maturity and Structure Indices in organic farming show improved soil health. • Lower Basal Index values in organic farming show improved soil ecological stability. • Soil management (tillage vs. cover cropping) has limited effects on nematode communities. • Nematode HTS metabarcoding is a powerful tool for soil health assessment in vineyards. Agricultural practices profoundly impact soil health, yet the tools available to assess these effects remain limited and require further refinement. Soil nematodes are valuable bioindicators of agroecosystem health due to their role in nutrient cycling and sensitivity to environmental changes. While traditional soil community assessments have relied on morphology-based identification, advances in molecular techniques, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding, enable more comprehensive and fine-scale characterizations. This study evaluated how pest and soil management practices influence soil nematode communities in DOCa Rioja vineyards (Northern Spain). We hypothesized that organic viticulture and cover cropping would enhance nematode diversity, food web complexity, and soil health indicators compared to integrated pest management (IPM) and tillage practices. We applied HTS metabarcoding to test this, identifying 114 nematode taxa to assess nematode diversity, trophic composition, and network connectivity across 57 vineyards. We also calculated diversity metrics and nematode-based indices and analyzed key abiotic soil properties to explore their influence on nematode community structure. Our results show that organic viticulture significantly enhanced nematode diversity ( P < 0.001), food web complexity, and ecological stability, as reflected in significantly higher ( P < 0.01) Maturity Index (MI) and Structure Index (SI) values, along with lower ( P < 0.01) Basal Index (BI) values. Additionally, organic vineyards exhibited greater network connectivity, indicating a more structured and resilient soil food web than IPM. In contrast, tillage and cover cropping had limited effects on nematode community structure and soil health indices, suggesting a weaker influence on nematode-mediated soil functions under the studied conditions. These findings underscore the benefits of organic viticulture in enhancing soil biodiversity and ecological stability, reinforcing the role of sustainable farming practices in maintaining soil health. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of nematode DNA metabarcoding as a robust tool for soil health assessment, providing a comprehensive, fine-scale perspective on soil nematode communities across different management strategies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ecological Indicators
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2025.113696
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Nematode management and characterization studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.75
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Metabarcoding-based characterization of soil nematode communities to assess soil health in viticulture

Rubén Blanco-Pérez, María de Toro, Alícia Pou, Raquel Campos‐Herrera et al.
1 citations
Ecological Indicators
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.75
article

Metabarcoding-based characterization of soil nematode communities to assess soil health in viticulture

Rubén Blanco-Pérez, María de Toro, Alícia Pou, Raquel Campos‐Herrera, Sara Sánchez‐Moreno, Sergio Álvarez‐Ortega
article en
1 citations

Abstract

• Organic viticulture enhances soil nematode diversity and network connectivity. • Higher Maturity and Structure Indices in organic farming show improved soil health. • Lower Basal Index values in organic farming show improved soil ecological stability. • Soil management (tillage vs. cover cropping) has limited effects on nematode communities. • Nematode HTS metabarcoding is a powerful tool for soil health assessment in vineyards. Agricultural practices profoundly impact soil health, yet the tools available to assess these effects remain limited and require further refinement. Soil nematodes are valuable bioindicators of agroecosystem health due to their role in nutrient cycling and sensitivity to environmental changes. While traditional soil community assessments have relied on morphology-based identification, advances in molecular techniques, such as high-throughput sequencing (HTS) metabarcoding, enable more comprehensive and fine-scale characterizations. This study evaluated how pest and soil management practices influence soil nematode communities in DOCa Rioja vineyards (Northern Spain). We hypothesized that organic viticulture and cover cropping would enhance nematode diversity, food web complexity, and soil health indicators compared to integrated pest management (IPM) and tillage practices. We applied HTS metabarcoding to test this, identifying 114 nematode taxa to assess nematode diversity, trophic composition, and network connectivity across 57 vineyards. We also calculated diversity metrics and nematode-based indices and analyzed key abiotic soil properties to explore their influence on nematode community structure. Our results show that organic viticulture significantly enhanced nematode diversity ( P < 0.001), food web complexity, and ecological stability, as reflected in significantly higher ( P < 0.01) Maturity Index (MI) and Structure Index (SI) values, along with lower ( P < 0.01) Basal Index (BI) values. Additionally, organic vineyards exhibited greater network connectivity, indicating a more structured and resilient soil food web than IPM. In contrast, tillage and cover cropping had limited effects on nematode community structure and soil health indices, suggesting a weaker influence on nematode-mediated soil functions under the studied conditions. These findings underscore the benefits of organic viticulture in enhancing soil biodiversity and ecological stability, reinforcing the role of sustainable farming practices in maintaining soil health. Furthermore, this study highlights the potential of nematode DNA metabarcoding as a robust tool for soil health assessment, providing a comprehensive, fine-scale perspective on soil nematode communities across different management strategies.

Ecological IndicatorsVol. 176
Universidad Rey Juan Carlos (ES), Misión Biológica de Galicia (ES), Museo Nacional de Ciencias Naturales (ES), Center for Biomedical Research of La Rioja (ES), Gobierno de La Rioja (ES)
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Nematode management and characterization studies
1.75
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.