The Role of Point of Care Ultrasounds (POCUS) in the Setting of In-Hospital Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized during cardiac arrest to identify potentially reversible causes of Pulseless-Electrical Activity (PEA). This study analyzed 20 cases where PEA was the initial rhythm, utilizing curved prove through the subxiphoid view to minimize interruptions during chest compressions. In 20 cases, POCUS findings were negative for reversible causes including cardiac temponade, tension pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism or cardiac thrombus. All patients received standard Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) interventions. Despite these measures, all 20 patients succumbed and the decision to terminate resuscitation was based on clinical judgments rather than POCUS findings of cardiac contractility. These results highlight the limited impact of POCUS findings on resuscitation outcomes in this cohort and emphasize the need for further research into its role in guiding clinical decision-making during cardiac arrest.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Medical Research
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.46889/jcmr.2025.6202
Primary Topic
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Role of Point of Care Ultrasounds (POCUS) in the Setting of In-Hospital Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest

Ahmed Noaman
1 links
Journal of Clinical Medical Research
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
article

The Role of Point of Care Ultrasounds (POCUS) in the Setting of In-Hospital Pulseless Electrical Activity Cardiac Arrest

Ahmed Noaman
article en

Abstract

Point-of-Care Ultrasound (POCUS) is increasingly utilized during cardiac arrest to identify potentially reversible causes of Pulseless-Electrical Activity (PEA). This study analyzed 20 cases where PEA was the initial rhythm, utilizing curved prove through the subxiphoid view to minimize interruptions during chest compressions. In 20 cases, POCUS findings were negative for reversible causes including cardiac temponade, tension pneumothorax, pulmonary embolism or cardiac thrombus. All patients received standard Advanced Cardiovascular Life Support (ACLS) interventions. Despite these measures, all 20 patients succumbed and the decision to terminate resuscitation was based on clinical judgments rather than POCUS findings of cardiac contractility. These results highlight the limited impact of POCUS findings on resuscitation outcomes in this cohort and emphasize the need for further research into its role in guiding clinical decision-making during cardiac arrest.

Journal of Clinical Medical Research
Peace, Justice and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 79%
Cardiac Arrest and Resuscitation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.