Sequential pattern detection: similarities and differences across various fields

Abstract Detecting pattern matches underpins key operations across fields, such as complex event processing (CEP), sequential pattern mining (SPM), string pattern matching, pattern mining from a large sequence, and business process mining. These fields employ various notations and definitions for the detected patterns, posing challenges in recognizing their shared underlying concepts. This work aims to bridge these gaps by proposing a unified notation and terminology and then cataloging various pattern queries and constraints identified in different fields into a comprehensive framework. Our analysis reveals substantial similarities among the various pattern types, suggesting a promising avenue for the transfer of techniques between disciplines. This approach paves the way to leverage existing knowledge efficiently and circumvent the redundancy of “reinventing the wheel”.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10618-025-01110-w
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
6.49

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Sequential pattern detection: similarities and differences across various fields

Anastasios Gounaris, Kostas Tsichlas, Ioannis Mavroudopoulos
2 citations
Data Mining and Knowledge Discovery
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
6.49
article

Sequential pattern detection: similarities and differences across various fields

Anastasios Gounaris, Kostas Tsichlas, Ioannis Mavroudopoulos
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Abstract Detecting pattern matches underpins key operations across fields, such as complex event processing (CEP), sequential pattern mining (SPM), string pattern matching, pattern mining from a large sequence, and business process mining. These fields employ various notations and definitions for the detected patterns, posing challenges in recognizing their shared underlying concepts. This work aims to bridge these gaps by proposing a unified notation and terminology and then cataloging various pattern queries and constraints identified in different fields into a comprehensive framework. Our analysis reveals substantial similarities among the various pattern types, suggesting a promising avenue for the transfer of techniques between disciplines. This approach paves the way to leverage existing knowledge efficiently and circumvent the redundancy of “reinventing the wheel”.

Data Mining and Knowledge DiscoveryVol. 39(4)
University of Patras (GR), Aristotle University of Thessaloniki (GR)
Hellenic Academic Libraries Link, Aristotle University of Thessaloniki
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Data Mining Algorithms and Applications
6.49
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.