The Force of Love and the Institution of Marriage: A Study of The Guide, Candida, and Hayavadana

The exploration of love and the institution of marriage has been a recurring theme in literature across cultures and epochs. It has been depicted as both a sanctified social contract and a restriction on personal freedom. The interplay between love and marriage, especially the ways in which love both disrupts and reaffirms the boundaries of marriage, has become a key concern for many authors. The works of R. K. Narayan, George Bernard Shaw, and Girish Karnad—The Guide (1958), Candida (1894), and Hayavadana (1971), respectively—offer profound insights into these themes. Through an exploration of these texts, we can see how love functions as a transformative, often rebellious, force against the confines of marriage. In this paper, we shall explore how each work presents love as a force that either challenges or subverts the institution of marriage. These three texts—while distinct in cultural, social, and historical context—share common themes in their exploration of love’s potential to disrupt, redefine, and revolt against the norms of marital relationships. Furthermore, by examining the characters’ relationships to love and marriage, we can understand the deeper philosophical questions these authors engage with, particularly concerning individual freedom, societal expectations, and human identity.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
Published
2025-05-24
DOI
https://doi.org/10.36892/ijlls.v7i3.2112
Primary Topic
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Force of Love and the Institution of Marriage: A Study of The Guide, Candida, and Hayavadana

JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
International Journal of Language and Literary Studies
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
article

The Force of Love and the Institution of Marriage: A Study of The Guide, Candida, and Hayavadana

JITENDRA KUMAR MISHRA
article en

Abstract

The exploration of love and the institution of marriage has been a recurring theme in literature across cultures and epochs. It has been depicted as both a sanctified social contract and a restriction on personal freedom. The interplay between love and marriage, especially the ways in which love both disrupts and reaffirms the boundaries of marriage, has become a key concern for many authors. The works of R. K. Narayan, George Bernard Shaw, and Girish Karnad—The Guide (1958), Candida (1894), and Hayavadana (1971), respectively—offer profound insights into these themes. Through an exploration of these texts, we can see how love functions as a transformative, often rebellious, force against the confines of marriage. In this paper, we shall explore how each work presents love as a force that either challenges or subverts the institution of marriage. These three texts—while distinct in cultural, social, and historical context—share common themes in their exploration of love’s potential to disrupt, redefine, and revolt against the norms of marital relationships. Furthermore, by examining the characters’ relationships to love and marriage, we can understand the deeper philosophical questions these authors engage with, particularly concerning individual freedom, societal expectations, and human identity.

International Journal of Language and Literary StudiesVol. 7(3)
Babasaheb Bhimrao Ambedkar Bihar University (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 83%
Marriage and Sexual Relationships
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.