A systematic literature review of performance measurement systems and the integration of ESG factors

This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) investigates the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into corporate Performance Measurement Systems. Based on an analysis of 61 peer-reviewed articles from the Web of Science and Business Source Ultimate databases, the review addresses three central research questions: (1) What is the current state of the literature on Sustainable Performance Measurement? (2) Which ESG factors can be integrated into a Sustainable Performance Measurement System for companies to maximize information output while minimizing the number of required factors? (3) How can ESG factors be measured to contribute to improvements and long-term sustainability value creation for corporations? The analysis reveals a marked and sustained rise in scholarly attention to Sustainable Performance Measurement between 2004 and 2024, with the number of publications more than doubling between the periods 2014–2017 and 2018–2021. While most studies consider all three ESG dimensions, environmental factors receive the most attention—frequently alongside governance and, to a lesser extent, social aspects such as working conditions, diversity, and stakeholder impact. This review synthesizes major developments in the field, including the design of individual frameworks, decision support models, and composite indexes for ESG performance assessment. It identifies the most relevant ESG components for inclusion in PMSs and critically evaluates how these factors are currently measured, offering insights into their practical contribution to corporate performance improvement. • Sustainability performance measurement research doubled between 2014–2017 and 2018–2021. • Environmental factors dominate, while governance is the least studied ESG dimension. • Only 22 studies comprehensively integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance factors. • Reporting of ESG factors is significantly underexplored compared to measurement and management. • Frameworks and decision-support models are the most common tools for ESG integration.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.indic.2025.100746
Citations
12
Primary Topic
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
25.28
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A systematic literature review of performance measurement systems and the integration of ESG factors

Andreas Dauerer
12 citations
Environmental and Sustainability Indicators
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
25.28
article

A systematic literature review of performance measurement systems and the integration of ESG factors

Andreas Dauerer
article en
12 citations

Abstract

This Systematic Literature Review (SLR) investigates the integration of Environmental, Social, and Governance (ESG) factors into corporate Performance Measurement Systems. Based on an analysis of 61 peer-reviewed articles from the Web of Science and Business Source Ultimate databases, the review addresses three central research questions: (1) What is the current state of the literature on Sustainable Performance Measurement? (2) Which ESG factors can be integrated into a Sustainable Performance Measurement System for companies to maximize information output while minimizing the number of required factors? (3) How can ESG factors be measured to contribute to improvements and long-term sustainability value creation for corporations? The analysis reveals a marked and sustained rise in scholarly attention to Sustainable Performance Measurement between 2004 and 2024, with the number of publications more than doubling between the periods 2014–2017 and 2018–2021. While most studies consider all three ESG dimensions, environmental factors receive the most attention—frequently alongside governance and, to a lesser extent, social aspects such as working conditions, diversity, and stakeholder impact. This review synthesizes major developments in the field, including the design of individual frameworks, decision support models, and composite indexes for ESG performance assessment. It identifies the most relevant ESG components for inclusion in PMSs and critically evaluates how these factors are currently measured, offering insights into their practical contribution to corporate performance improvement. • Sustainability performance measurement research doubled between 2014–2017 and 2018–2021. • Environmental factors dominate, while governance is the least studied ESG dimension. • Only 22 studies comprehensively integrate Environmental, Social, and Governance factors. • Reporting of ESG factors is significantly underexplored compared to measurement and management. • Frameworks and decision-support models are the most common tools for ESG integration.

Environmental and Sustainability IndicatorsVol. 27
Catholic University of Eichstätt-Ingolstadt (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 0%
Efficiency Analysis Using DEA
25.28
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

A systematic literature review of performance measurement systems and the integration of ESG factors — Andreas Dauerer · Environmental and Sustainability Indicators (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS