Accuracy of farmer-generated yield estimations of common bean in decentralised on-farm trials in sub–Saharan Africa

Improving agricultural productivity and resilience is essential to meet future food needs in sub-Saharan Africa under changing climate conditions. Achieving this will necessitate the development of high-yielding locally adapted crop varieties to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Despite advancements in crop improvement, varietal turnover in smallholder farms remains notably low. Continuous turnover of locally adapted varieties is essential, necessitating active dissemination of new varieties and withdrawal of obsolete ones across diverse target populations using participatory breeding approaches. A decentralised experimental approach, known as tricot, supported by citizen science, has proven effective in accelerating genotype selection while promoting inclusivity and diversity. However, the methodology has strongly relied on farmer-generated rankings, which provide relative performance insights but fall short in informing breeders with absolute yield data, limiting the ability to measure genetic gain or assess economic returns on breeding investments. To address this gap, we validated the accuracy of farmer-generated yield data for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), by comparing it with technician-generated volumes and researcher-generated absolute yield data. Results revealed strong correlations between farmer and technician volumes (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). The mean difference in farmer-technician log-yield was close to zero, indicating significant agreement. We further developed a predictive model to estimate absolute yields using farmer showing minimal influence from intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Our findings demonstrate that farmer-generated yield data can reliably inform breeding decisions and support the accelerated turnover of improved varieties. Integrating such data into breeding programs offers a cost-effective and scalable pathway to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability across smallholder systems in sub-Saharan Africa. • We tested if farmer yield estimates can accurately capture absolute crop variety performance on-farm. • Farmer-generated data correlated strongly with technician-measured yields. • Yield accuracy was minimally affected by external factors; 25 farmers were enough for reliable data. • We developed a predictive model converting farmer data into accurate grain yield estimates.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Journal of Agronomy
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eja.2025.127730
Citations
3
Primary Topic
Genetics and Plant Breeding
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
5.25

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Accuracy of farmer-generated yield estimations of common bean in decentralised on-farm trials in sub–Saharan Africa

Joost van Heerwaarden, Jacob van Etten, Hugo Dorado, Svein Øivind Sølberg et al.
3 citations
European Journal of Agronomy
Genetics and Plant Breeding
5.25
article

Accuracy of farmer-generated yield estimations of common bean in decentralised on-farm trials in sub–Saharan Africa

Joost van Heerwaarden, Jacob van Etten, Hugo Dorado, Svein Øivind Sølberg, Kauê de Sousa, Mabel Nabateregga, T. E. Gregory
article en
3 citations

Abstract

Improving agricultural productivity and resilience is essential to meet future food needs in sub-Saharan Africa under changing climate conditions. Achieving this will necessitate the development of high-yielding locally adapted crop varieties to mitigate the impacts of climate change. Despite advancements in crop improvement, varietal turnover in smallholder farms remains notably low. Continuous turnover of locally adapted varieties is essential, necessitating active dissemination of new varieties and withdrawal of obsolete ones across diverse target populations using participatory breeding approaches. A decentralised experimental approach, known as tricot, supported by citizen science, has proven effective in accelerating genotype selection while promoting inclusivity and diversity. However, the methodology has strongly relied on farmer-generated rankings, which provide relative performance insights but fall short in informing breeders with absolute yield data, limiting the ability to measure genetic gain or assess economic returns on breeding investments. To address this gap, we validated the accuracy of farmer-generated yield data for common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.), by comparing it with technician-generated volumes and researcher-generated absolute yield data. Results revealed strong correlations between farmer and technician volumes (r = 0.96, p < 0.001). The mean difference in farmer-technician log-yield was close to zero, indicating significant agreement. We further developed a predictive model to estimate absolute yields using farmer showing minimal influence from intrinsic and extrinsic factors. Our findings demonstrate that farmer-generated yield data can reliably inform breeding decisions and support the accelerated turnover of improved varieties. Integrating such data into breeding programs offers a cost-effective and scalable pathway to enhance agricultural productivity and sustainability across smallholder systems in sub-Saharan Africa. • We tested if farmer yield estimates can accurately capture absolute crop variety performance on-farm. • Farmer-generated data correlated strongly with technician-measured yields. • Yield accuracy was minimally affected by external factors; 25 farmers were enough for reliable data. • We developed a predictive model converting farmer data into accurate grain yield estimates.

European Journal of AgronomyVol. 170
Tanzania Wildlife Research Institute (TZ), University of Inland Norway (NO), Mikocheni Agricultural Research Institute (TZ), Wageningen University & Research (NL)
Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation
Zero hunger
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Genetics and Plant Breeding
5.25
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.