Adversity Quotient and Suicidal Ideation Among LGBTQIA++ College Students

This research employed a descriptive design to evaluate the Adversity Quotient among LGBTQIA++ college students, alongside CORE constructs and their levels of suicidal ideation, using a correlational research approach to identify significant relationships. A non-parametric test was utilized to determine differences in Adversity Quotient and suicidal ideation levels when respondents were grouped by sexual preference. Findings indicate LGBTQIA++ college students encounter challenges in maintaining control, assuming responsibility, and navigating adversity, often attributed to external factors or a lack of self-belief. While demonstrating adaptability, their overall resilience remains at an average level, with sexual orientation showing no significant impact on coping strategies. Despite adversity, many respondents showed no suicidal ideation, suggesting a level of mental well-being and resilience. However, coping abilities alone do not directly correlate with suicidal thoughts, emphasizing the need for multifaceted approaches in addressing such ideation among LGBTQIA++ individuals. Recommendations include university policies fostering safe spaces for LGBTQIA++ students, such as anti-bullying measures, gender-neutral facilities, and staff education on LGBTQIA++ issues. Guidance counselors and advocates should receive specialized training and collaborate with the Gender and Development office to offer tailored activities and psychoeducational sessions involving parents. Individual sessions, risk assessments, crisis interventions, and safety planning are suggested. Personalized strategies, considering personality, culture, and social support, are essential for effective mental health interventions. LGBTQIA++ students are encouraged to seek representation by forming accredited organizations to promote awareness and inclusivity. Future research should explore unaddressed factors like cultural influences, personality traits, and social status.