Inhaler Technique Comparison Between Dry Powder Inhaler and Metered Dose Inhaler Among Adults with Obstructive Airway Disease in a Tertiary Government Hospital Outpatient Setting

Background: In the management of obstructive airway diseases, inhaled medication remains a cornerstone of therapy. Aside from medication type, the manner of delivery through various devices is important. Evaluating current practice provides a measure of performance and allows identification of areas for improvement. The study evaluated inhaler techniques of patients on dry powder inhalers (DPI) versus metered dose inhalers (MDI) at the outpatient setting. The prevalence of specific inhaler technique errors was assessed along with associated factors. Methodology: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design, involving patients with use of DPI and/or MDI for the past six months. Inhaler technique was evaluated and a short instruction on proper technique was provided with repeat evaluation immediately after. Results: A total of 124 participants were assessed, resulting in 76 DPI and 52 MDI technique observations. Overall, a higher prevalence of any error was observed for DPI at 88.2% versus MDI at 86.5%. Immediately post-instruction, repeat assessment showed significant improvement, with reduction of any error to 57.9% (DPI) and 50% (MDI) (p <0.001 for both). The most common DPI errors were failure to perform full exhalation prior (77.6%) and lack of sufficient breath holding after (44.7%). The most common MDI errors were failure to perform full exhalation prior (71.2%) and improper inhalation (53.8%). For MDI users, only advanced age had an association with having any error (OR 1.10, CI 1.03-1.17). Conclusion: Inhaler technique errors remain high in the outpatient setting regardless of device, with older participants at risk of having errors with MDI, but not with DPI. Although technique review and instruction show promise in reducing errors, the durability of these skills is known to decay. Appropriate patient and device selection, along with regular technique assessment and reinforcement by healthcare professionals, remains the recommended practice to maximize the benefit of inhalers.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philippine journal of chest diseases
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.70172/pjcd.v23i1.10955
Primary Topic
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Inhaler Technique Comparison Between Dry Powder Inhaler and Metered Dose Inhaler Among Adults with Obstructive Airway Disease in a Tertiary Government Hospital Outpatient Setting

Matthew Tan, Ma. Cecilia Lozada, Cary Amiel Villanueva, Henry Medina
1 links
Philippine journal of chest diseases
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
article

Inhaler Technique Comparison Between Dry Powder Inhaler and Metered Dose Inhaler Among Adults with Obstructive Airway Disease in a Tertiary Government Hospital Outpatient Setting

Matthew Tan, Ma. Cecilia Lozada, Cary Amiel Villanueva, Henry Medina
article en

Abstract

Background: In the management of obstructive airway diseases, inhaled medication remains a cornerstone of therapy. Aside from medication type, the manner of delivery through various devices is important. Evaluating current practice provides a measure of performance and allows identification of areas for improvement. The study evaluated inhaler techniques of patients on dry powder inhalers (DPI) versus metered dose inhalers (MDI) at the outpatient setting. The prevalence of specific inhaler technique errors was assessed along with associated factors. Methodology: This study was conducted with a cross-sectional design, involving patients with use of DPI and/or MDI for the past six months. Inhaler technique was evaluated and a short instruction on proper technique was provided with repeat evaluation immediately after. Results: A total of 124 participants were assessed, resulting in 76 DPI and 52 MDI technique observations. Overall, a higher prevalence of any error was observed for DPI at 88.2% versus MDI at 86.5%. Immediately post-instruction, repeat assessment showed significant improvement, with reduction of any error to 57.9% (DPI) and 50% (MDI) (p <0.001 for both). The most common DPI errors were failure to perform full exhalation prior (77.6%) and lack of sufficient breath holding after (44.7%). The most common MDI errors were failure to perform full exhalation prior (71.2%) and improper inhalation (53.8%). For MDI users, only advanced age had an association with having any error (OR 1.10, CI 1.03-1.17). Conclusion: Inhaler technique errors remain high in the outpatient setting regardless of device, with older participants at risk of having errors with MDI, but not with DPI. Although technique review and instruction show promise in reducing errors, the durability of these skills is known to decay. Appropriate patient and device selection, along with regular technique assessment and reinforcement by healthcare professionals, remains the recommended practice to maximize the benefit of inhalers.

Philippine journal of chest diseasesVol. 23(1)
Philippine General Hospital (PH), University of the Philippines Manila (PH)
Openalex Percentile: Top 78%
Inhalation and Respiratory Drug Delivery
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.