Novel insight into the influence of supports on the performance of α-MnO2 catalysts for ozone-assisted VOC oxidation: A comparative study of inert and semiconductor supports, impact of operational parameters, and stability assessments
This study investigates the impact of different supports on the performance of α-MnO₂ in ozone-assisted catalytic oxidation of volatile organic compounds (VOCs). Two supports, ZSM-5 and SiO 2 , were compared for effectiveness in removing polar (acetone) and nonpolar (toluene) VOCs. Catalysts were characterized by TGA, BET, TEM, XRD, HRTEM, XPS, EDX, and SEM analyses. Results showed that α-MnO 2 /ZSM-5 achieved superior removal efficiencies (93% acetone, 96% toluene), attributed to the higher density of oxygen vacancies and lower Mn oxidation states facilitated by ZSM-5. Operational parameters such as relative humidity and temperature were also evaluated, demonstrating enhanced catalyst stability and performance in humid conditions. α-MnO 2 /ZSM-5 exhibited minimal deactivation (<5%) after 10 cycles, highlighting its potential for sustainable air purification applications. • The role of inert and semiconductor supports in the catalytic activity and stability of α-MnO 2 for VOC removal is explored. • The effect of operational parameters for the removal of polar and non-polar VOCs is investigated. • α-MnO 2 /ZSM-5 shows 96% toluene and 93% acetone removal, outperforming α-MnO 2 /SiO 2 and pure α-MnO 2 . • The acidity of ZSM-5 contributes to better Mn stabilization compared to the neutral SiO 2 support. • Higher Brønsted and Lewis acidity of ZSM-5 promotes effective redox cycling in VOC oxidation.
Authors
- Amir Payan
- Jafar Soltan (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4323-0063)
- Farid Jafarihaghighi
Institutions
- University of Saskatchewan (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Catalysis Today
- Published
- 2025-06-06
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cattod.2025.115418
- Citations
- 3
- Primary Topic
- Catalytic Processes in Materials Science
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 1.55
Funders
- University of Saskatchewan
- Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada