Acceptability of Digital Spiritual Care

This study aims to, first, measure previous experience with and acceptance of digital spiritual care in a healthcare context, and to identify related sociodemographic characteristics and religious/spiritual factors. Secondly, it explores the reasons related to the acceptability of different models of digital spiritual care during or after hospitalization following severe illness or accident. A two-phase sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used based on a representative population survey of the Swiss canton of Zurich (N = 1,011) and semi-structured interviews (n = 12) using scenario-based discussion. A linear regression model was calculated to identify the effects of experience with digital spiritual care, sociodemographic variables, and self-assessed religiosity/spirituality on acceptance. Interviews were coded deductively considering the respondent’s view of the acceptance of each model and the reasons for it in different situations, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and other points of importance in a potential use case. Acceptance is significantly related to age and previous experience, including experience with professional and self-care using digital tools. As shown in the qualitative phase, acceptance further varies according to the model of care (supplemental, hybrid, digital-only), the affordances of the technology in question, and context-specific factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Health and Social Care Chaplaincy
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1558/hscc.33203
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
34.53

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Acceptability of Digital Spiritual Care

Simon Peng‐Keller, Fabian Winiger, Jörg Schneider
2 citations
Health and Social Care Chaplaincy
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
34.53
article

Acceptability of Digital Spiritual Care

Simon Peng‐Keller, Fabian Winiger, Jörg Schneider
article en
2 citations

Abstract

This study aims to, first, measure previous experience with and acceptance of digital spiritual care in a healthcare context, and to identify related sociodemographic characteristics and religious/spiritual factors. Secondly, it explores the reasons related to the acceptability of different models of digital spiritual care during or after hospitalization following severe illness or accident. A two-phase sequential explanatory mixed methods design was used based on a representative population survey of the Swiss canton of Zurich (N = 1,011) and semi-structured interviews (n = 12) using scenario-based discussion. A linear regression model was calculated to identify the effects of experience with digital spiritual care, sociodemographic variables, and self-assessed religiosity/spirituality on acceptance. Interviews were coded deductively considering the respondent’s view of the acceptance of each model and the reasons for it in different situations, perceived advantages and disadvantages, and other points of importance in a potential use case. Acceptance is significantly related to age and previous experience, including experience with professional and self-care using digital tools. As shown in the qualitative phase, acceptance further varies according to the model of care (supplemental, hybrid, digital-only), the affordances of the technology in question, and context-specific factors.

Health and Social Care ChaplaincyVol. 13(2)
University of Zurich (CH)
La Trobe University, Victoria University, Universität Zürich, Tartu Ülikool
Openalex Percentile: Top 1%
Media, Religion, Digital Communication
34.53
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.