Experience-sampling methods for self-compassion research: A meta-analysis

Self-compassion is a sensitivity to attend to one’s own suffering with a desire to take helpful action to alleviate it. Applying experience sampling methods (ESM) to self-compassion research may provide insight to the dynamic and context-specific impacts of self-compassion on psychological well-being and distress. This meta-analysis provides a synthesis of the recent growth in self-compassion ESM studies. We compare the methodologies in ESM studies and analyze the potentially dynamic relationship between self-compassion and psychological well-being and distress in daily life. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies that used a self-compassion measure and ESM were included. Thirty-one studies with a total of 3,370 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis and 19 studies were included in further meta-analyses. Results demonstrate that most ESM studies sampled data once daily for less than one week. There were notably higher compliance rates in studies that offered financial compensation. The results of the meta-analysis indicated significant and moderate associations between within person self-compassion and both psychological well-being and distress. Between study heterogeneity ranged from 52% to 85.6%. It was found that within person pooled effect sizes were smaller than between person pooled effect sizes for the association between self-compassion and all outcomes, suggesting there may be more variability in these relationships within individuals across time compared to averages aggregated across a group of individuals. ESM is a promising method of exploring within-person variability in self-compassion as experienced in daily life. Current gaps for future research to address include targeting youth and clinical samples using ESM. • ESM studies using self-compassion measures typically sampled once daily for approximately 1-week periods. • Within-person pooled associations between self-compassion and psychological well-being and distress were smaller than between person associations. • Findings suggest that there may be more variability in these relationships within each individual across time compared to averages aggregated across a group of individuals. • Research gaps in self-compassion studies using ESM include youth and clinical samples.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcbs.2025.100913
Primary Topic
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Experience-sampling methods for self-compassion research: A meta-analysis

Baljinder K. Sahdra, Madeleine I. Fraser, Tsz Ying Wong, Keong Yap et al.
Journal of Contextual Behavioral Science
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
article

Experience-sampling methods for self-compassion research: A meta-analysis

Baljinder K. Sahdra, Madeleine I. Fraser, Tsz Ying Wong, Keong Yap, Joseph Ciarrochi, W. Li, Monique T. Andreacchio
article en

Abstract

Self-compassion is a sensitivity to attend to one’s own suffering with a desire to take helpful action to alleviate it. Applying experience sampling methods (ESM) to self-compassion research may provide insight to the dynamic and context-specific impacts of self-compassion on psychological well-being and distress. This meta-analysis provides a synthesis of the recent growth in self-compassion ESM studies. We compare the methodologies in ESM studies and analyze the potentially dynamic relationship between self-compassion and psychological well-being and distress in daily life. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PsycINFO, and Web of Science databases were searched. Studies that used a self-compassion measure and ESM were included. Thirty-one studies with a total of 3,370 participants were included in the qualitative synthesis and 19 studies were included in further meta-analyses. Results demonstrate that most ESM studies sampled data once daily for less than one week. There were notably higher compliance rates in studies that offered financial compensation. The results of the meta-analysis indicated significant and moderate associations between within person self-compassion and both psychological well-being and distress. Between study heterogeneity ranged from 52% to 85.6%. It was found that within person pooled effect sizes were smaller than between person pooled effect sizes for the association between self-compassion and all outcomes, suggesting there may be more variability in these relationships within individuals across time compared to averages aggregated across a group of individuals. ESM is a promising method of exploring within-person variability in self-compassion as experienced in daily life. Current gaps for future research to address include targeting youth and clinical samples using ESM. • ESM studies using self-compassion measures typically sampled once daily for approximately 1-week periods. • Within-person pooled associations between self-compassion and psychological well-being and distress were smaller than between person associations. • Findings suggest that there may be more variability in these relationships within each individual across time compared to averages aggregated across a group of individuals. • Research gaps in self-compassion studies using ESM include youth and clinical samples.

Journal of Contextual Behavioral ScienceVol. 37
Australian Catholic University (AU)
Australian Catholic University
Openalex Percentile: Top 82%
Mindfulness and Compassion Interventions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.