To the rescue? A nationwide survey of the who, what, and why of wildlife rescue in Australia

Wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and release is a global practice that generates significant public interest. Nonetheless, little is known about the people who choose to engage in or abstain from wildlife rescue. Here we present the results from the first nationwide survey in Australia ( n = 492) about peoples' knowledge, beliefs and practice of wildlife rescue. Sixty-three percent of respondents underestimated the scale of wildlife rescue in Australia, 68 % of respondents overestimated the survival outcomes of rescued wildlife, and 59 % of respondents reported rescuing a wild animal in the 12-months prior to taking the survey. Forty-four percent of respondents held self-contradicting beliefs, selecting answers that reflected a central concern for animal welfare while simultaneously prioritising or avoiding the rescue of particular species. We identified two beliefs significantly associated with differing odds of wildlife rescue: beliefs about the type of wildlife rescued and beliefs about how rescued wildlife should be prioritised for care. We identified similar significant associations with the sociodemographic characteristics of age, gender, and region of childhood upbringing. Of note, we found no significant associations with participation in wildlife rescue based on housing, rural/metro location, education level, political inclination, or religion. Our study serves as a step towards closing the knowledge gap about the people who engage in wildlife rescue – a key requirement to developing effective and targeted monitoring and communication about the practice.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Biological Conservation
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biocon.2025.111275
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
1.72
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To the rescue? A nationwide survey of the who, what, and why of wildlife rescue in Australia

Mandy Paterson, Richard A. Fuller, Gloeta N. Massie, Ella Kuskoff
1 citations
Biological Conservation
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
article

To the rescue? A nationwide survey of the who, what, and why of wildlife rescue in Australia

Mandy Paterson, Richard A. Fuller, Gloeta N. Massie, Ella Kuskoff
article en
1 citations

Abstract

Wildlife rescue, rehabilitation, and release is a global practice that generates significant public interest. Nonetheless, little is known about the people who choose to engage in or abstain from wildlife rescue. Here we present the results from the first nationwide survey in Australia ( n = 492) about peoples' knowledge, beliefs and practice of wildlife rescue. Sixty-three percent of respondents underestimated the scale of wildlife rescue in Australia, 68 % of respondents overestimated the survival outcomes of rescued wildlife, and 59 % of respondents reported rescuing a wild animal in the 12-months prior to taking the survey. Forty-four percent of respondents held self-contradicting beliefs, selecting answers that reflected a central concern for animal welfare while simultaneously prioritising or avoiding the rescue of particular species. We identified two beliefs significantly associated with differing odds of wildlife rescue: beliefs about the type of wildlife rescued and beliefs about how rescued wildlife should be prioritised for care. We identified similar significant associations with the sociodemographic characteristics of age, gender, and region of childhood upbringing. Of note, we found no significant associations with participation in wildlife rescue based on housing, rural/metro location, education level, political inclination, or religion. Our study serves as a step towards closing the knowledge gap about the people who engage in wildlife rescue – a key requirement to developing effective and targeted monitoring and communication about the practice.

Biological ConservationVol. 309
The University of Queensland (AU), Queensland Centre for Mental Health Research (AU)
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Wildlife Ecology and Conservation
1.72
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

To the rescue? A nationwide survey of the who, what, and why of wildlife rescue in Australia — Mandy Paterson, Richard A. Fuller, et al. · Biological Conservation (2025) | TGRS Research Map | TGRS