[Implementation evaluation and analysis of occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Part 1: Chemical hazardous agents (GBZ 2.1-2019)].

<b>Objective:</b> By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard. <b>Methods:</b> From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions. <b>Results:</b> Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents. <b>Conclusion:</b> The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PubMed
Published
2025-05-20
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20241010-00462
Citations
1
Primary Topic
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
Type
article
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

[Implementation evaluation and analysis of occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Part 1: Chemical hazardous agents (GBZ 2.1-2019)].

T Liu, Ke Tian, T Li, Ping Qin et al.
1 citations
PubMed
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
article

[Implementation evaluation and analysis of occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Part 1: Chemical hazardous agents (GBZ 2.1-2019)].

T Liu, Ke Tian, T Li, Ping Qin, W J Li, Deyu Wang, Lu Yang, Chenghao Yu, X S Xie, Q H Zhu
article en
1 citations

Abstract

<b>Objective:</b> By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard. <b>Methods:</b> From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions. <b>Results:</b> Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents. <b>Conclusion:</b> The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.

PubMedVol. 43(5)
National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control (CN)
Chemical Safety and Risk Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.