[Implementation evaluation and analysis of occupational exposure limits for hazardous agents in the workplace Part 1: Chemical hazardous agents (GBZ 2.1-2019)].
<b>Objective:</b> By systematically evaluate the implementation of GBZ 2.1, so as to provide technical basis for the future revisions of this standard. <b>Methods:</b> From May to October 2023, Based on the pre survey questionnaire, the semi-structured interview method was used to interviews with experts from CDC, Occupational disease prevention and control hospital institutes, employers, occupational hygiene technical service intermediaries and universities, and the inductive method was used to extract the topics and relevant suggestions. <b>Results:</b> Generally, GBZ 2.1 is scientific, practical, progressiveness and operable. There are still some issues such as OELs overlapping and the correspondence between Chinese and English names. The outstanding problem is the coordination with other standard contents. <b>Conclusion:</b> The technical indicators in GBZ 2.1 could adapt to the needs of current practical work. The coordination between standards needs to be clarified, and the new recommended content needs further promotion and exploration on how to implement it.
Authors
- T Liu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6845-7806)
- Ke Tian (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0954-9350)
- T Li
- Ping Qin (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6741-6228)
- W J Li
- Deyu Wang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4674-3497)
- Lu Yang (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0007-0632-6246)
- Chenghao Yu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5769-9911)
- X S Xie
- Q H Zhu
Institutions
- National Institute for Occupational Health and Poison Control (CN)
Publication Details
- Journal
- PubMed
- Published
- 2025-05-20
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.3760/cma.j.cn121094-20241010-00462
- Citations
- 1
- Primary Topic
- Chemical Safety and Risk Management
- Type
- article