Are benevolent directors more environmentally responsible?

Purpose This research examines the relationship between board of director benevolence and corporate environmental performance (CEP). We also investigate how CEO benevolence moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from benevolent leadership, upper-echelon and enlightened stakeholder theories, we hypothesize a positive association between board benevolence and CEP. Director benevolence is measured by involvement in not-for-profit leadership positions simultaneously with their corporate directorships. Our sample is drawn from Australian listed firms from 2010 to 2019, and benevolence data is hand-collected from annual report director biographies. Findings We find that boards with more benevolent directors are associated with higher CEP. This relationship is stronger in firms managed by benevolent CEOs. Our results are consistent across several robustness tests, including matched samples, two-stage least squares (2SLS) and firm fixed effect regressions. Research limitations/implications Our findings have implications for regulatory bodies and environmental protection advocates in understanding the drivers of corporate environmental performance and are insightful for firms in structuring top leadership to enhance environmental initiatives. Originality/value While prior research reveals connections between board characteristics and CEP, our research examines a moral characteristic of directors, an overlooked dimension. Our results show the importance of benevolent directors in enhancing CEP.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Accounting Literature
Published
2025-06-06
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/jal-12-2024-0362
Citations
2
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
4.45
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Are benevolent directors more environmentally responsible?

Alexandra Williamson, Larelle Chapple, Ashesha Weerasinghe, John Nowland
2 citations
Journal of Accounting Literature
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
article

Are benevolent directors more environmentally responsible?

Alexandra Williamson, Larelle Chapple, Ashesha Weerasinghe, John Nowland
article en
2 citations

Abstract

Purpose This research examines the relationship between board of director benevolence and corporate environmental performance (CEP). We also investigate how CEO benevolence moderates this relationship. Design/methodology/approach Drawing from benevolent leadership, upper-echelon and enlightened stakeholder theories, we hypothesize a positive association between board benevolence and CEP. Director benevolence is measured by involvement in not-for-profit leadership positions simultaneously with their corporate directorships. Our sample is drawn from Australian listed firms from 2010 to 2019, and benevolence data is hand-collected from annual report director biographies. Findings We find that boards with more benevolent directors are associated with higher CEP. This relationship is stronger in firms managed by benevolent CEOs. Our results are consistent across several robustness tests, including matched samples, two-stage least squares (2SLS) and firm fixed effect regressions. Research limitations/implications Our findings have implications for regulatory bodies and environmental protection advocates in understanding the drivers of corporate environmental performance and are insightful for firms in structuring top leadership to enhance environmental initiatives. Originality/value While prior research reveals connections between board characteristics and CEP, our research examines a moral characteristic of directors, an overlooked dimension. Our results show the importance of benevolent directors in enhancing CEP.

Journal of Accounting LiteratureVol. 47(5)
Queensland University of Technology (AU), College of Accounting (SI), Illinois State University (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 6%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
4.45
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.